Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754642AbWKHSXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:23:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754636AbWKHSXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:23:21 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:27620 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754642AbWKHSXU (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:23:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 23:53:19 +0530 From: Dinakar Guniguntala To: Paul Jackson Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@osdl.org, mbligh@google.com, menage@google.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com, holt@sgi.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: Explicit dynamic sched domain cpuset flag Message-ID: <20061108182319.GA7924@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: dino@in.ibm.com References: <20061030212615.GA10567@in.ibm.com> <20061030212922.GA20369@in.ibm.com> <20061031064300.10a97c13.pj@sgi.com> <20061108023836.0f3bbd18.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061108023836.0f3bbd18.pj@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 39 On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:38:36AM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Dinakar, > > Where do we stand on this patch? > > Last I knew, as of a week ago: > > * I had (still have) a patch in *-mm to nuke the old connection > between the cpu_exclusive flag and sched domain partitioning: > cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets.patch > * and you have this patch posted on lkml, with some non-trivial > comments from myself, to provide a new 'sched_domain' per-cpuset > flag to control sched domain partitioning. > > Ideally, we'd agree on this new 'sched_domain' (or whatever we call it) > flag, so that my patch to remove the old hooks could travel to 2.6.20 > along with this present patch to provide new and improved hooks. > > However ... I need to focus on some other stuff for roughly four > weeks, so can't focus on pushing this effort along right now. > > My guess is that I will end up asking Andrew to hold the above > named "remove ... hooks" patch in *-mm until you and I get our > act together on the replacement, which most likely will mean he > holds it until we start work on what will become 2.6.21. > > Do you see any better choices? Paul, I got busy on my end too and hope to work on it next week. I guess I'll work on it with your suggestions and post it as soon as I can. You can take a look at them when you are free. Thank you for the patience -Dinakar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/