Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp284873pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:15:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3EJ0jqac/HPcu6gj7jgIVCETejZYXb5KfSzeF7wQElfE9sh+5Dc383pQniF14D/ga9f9e X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9059:: with SMTP id v25mr2842446ioq.113.1623834919652; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:15:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623834919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VGrZTUa8ZU72ZohNucVR67BQa/72MvhubqnJcKOgTqrtNwLieRAZ1CmrPH+sWcPzFs Q0OnydMbTOCt/okcWBbIPywCs1JyxnOZTodZR3dMNnbpeGVnvygRI3yXOSxqOED1ESS0 hIXfx4VnNjPyWrrd1Qlw5QXv6uA9vF76SCwGgxMkoQ7tm5RuvUNhbff+X2e7YFMF7PV2 40IozIfg5UrlLUulRplmiL65c0e7oIVbcf+cSeW6khOeBaDtrapo5v/ZJzdjTM3dZyXP bIY/vbFUXqgnnvf5obV8jht1/OzjNi7RFmdUlX08sDRpLnNWMeBjDOxterh4+gA95upR iP5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=woEUJSQPzzsrZxZAa+/M+JlRPCej/7Y84PKkTMcRmGw=; b=xhxlyIPf1+k5n+ebKZV46pdpHeBtUBiWmE1pwT2LZnEc87ndwoiy0VBKA5eDmrlUsA a/zcI+amxvehP8DF8XGI4TnPKB4LWlwZlHxASk4HkN6HupvxNZPD4Xz8BSwkvypQwGPM r6IBo+Nk2LuDSrEXpH6OkMUNQ/4jq1l29WyKfuRjpnpjzQ/ZL/pkCz8BDJlU3RjLQ3fQ JrWSQsKVTwUQT8EBtPH/kNmxXvqKbSDBxEQdC/m5fn/XLqZpmlDLVy7QLQfB2/+KLRGI M/a+/Lv+tDRKnPNVpeeFznCxFPI4MW/WUY145CwPbPDnT47C9F4uKKg3lG/WIWKDlpOs rkGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f22si1509553iol.68.2021.06.16.02.15.07; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232282AbhFPJPl (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:15:41 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59694 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232148AbhFPJPk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:15:40 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386731B; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EA963F70D; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:13:28 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, igor.skalkin@opensynergy.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com, Andriy.Tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add op to override max message # Message-ID: <20210616091328.GE35368@e120937-lin> References: <20210611165937.701-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210611165937.701-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210614150415.00005d92@Huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 17:59:28 +0100 > Cristian Marussi wrote: > > > From: Igor Skalkin > > > > The number of simultaneously pending messages that the upcoming > > scmi-virtio transport can support depends on the virtio device (SCMI > > platform) and can differ for each channel. (The scmi-virtio transport > > does only have one tx and at most 1 rx channel.) > > > > Add an optional transport op so that scmi-virtio can report the actual > > max message # for each channel type. Respect these new limits. > > > > Reflect that the limit in struct scmi_desc is now only a default any > > more. > > > > [ Peter: Adapted patch for submission to upstream. ] > > > > Co-developed-by: Peter Hilber > > Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber > Cristian, > > Give you are sending this on to the list, should have your > Signed-off-by as well. > Right, sorry for this, the series is still sort of WIP so I have not properly cleanup and signed these if I have not touched it. My bad, I'll fix. Thanks, Cristian