Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp295809pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwX+AoDqgSjVdQXgjlUP+6DSgTBAL+K8sLNj0Hzo7yIORHEfQzClCoJ+XKZblU6jdPG+s39 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4b15:: with SMTP id y21mr1871367eju.261.1623836072737; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623836072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r2Cb8QCDD2a68xv2eAiV4Bb17kqfIm30NabWeXcXOR/rlATABKeVmHaQzjNHbiNcif iG1Qhydq+9FSIXQzNebohXM9YncYYl07wbL3FB4JCUgYpgcHQSIKCOheK62gsiRyMLip 75z8IZGvZKWbJLQNH0PLIA20ZeN6g2cltz227qg0alQCBwXzdyw94RW3kD7EyUep0uEz cGGXRu3H1mWGC9dE9hSD0X90cYqI8EpldMUrSywNk/DgJqI3WskUEZ8dypb7x3eBrpEP QK/qxz1ga/TvUa4Czbr/mpIgY3BCN1BWSTIaqX1cRC1DiSQtfjkQtXSXqRpm+mBqcdQO h5Rw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=yDPHOfsdTrsbdSsSTpnxOQvdxI+2TFl3sTl+z5lK0fk=; b=stiwZtNxFoahcsvCkrWlHYNErwLTdU2mLS1Go/KaRsrMihn6lf7EjdJQEIKir24/G0 RQ0hSoy4gOU0EOEz7dMQWrskcyPWYTgNHV8Md0B7fPQQcgs3ztwQ/l94F1LXeCHf/vcg KQ7HnE43uLNCOVZAsdFl1j1Vn/YOM87zZpA4S0nqYUeMprfNUA8b5ibVexK8xHb2cNmB pnb3HC9+QoS2KdnhPfo4+DpKMQvZ/mzBYfeDCHDYmPKcnOuJGGu12ZmCXSTb0Bi9HSC+ AubNqWoGVjpUuI2cRpBjL9oV/k0a7//Zdd6HLRO8gRiUjLEJMfSkE1KRPLvVgDwDxFgY 3WWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=crjMNTpc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si1625209edd.4.2021.06.16.02.34.09; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=crjMNTpc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232299AbhFPJew (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:34:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57880 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231316AbhFPJev (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:34:51 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D77CA61241; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:32:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623835964; bh=8AvXjBBFzxg5JlXwhHSwDMVbECZC5ojPWbVn4wgeFPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=crjMNTpcpe6PqlbrwfRlT1BVL1hwmnl0jvXB4FW27BT+e9f8HHnS4zjBRSjujMVle Ny1Q0riWvwsn7V2om36BWUU9T9shxmjcXYw2mMlFSNiy8mc2JNZkZpj62DmS45UnE+ srlDWCltiq/w8Ngfa+Ak/zEhqUBhFRCUvH9lg1WQ= Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:32:41 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Amit Klein Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Willy Tarreau , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 175/244] inet: use bigger hash table for IP ID generation Message-ID: References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org> <20210512144748.600206118@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:16:52PM +0300, Amit Klein wrote: > Here is the patch (minus headers, description, etc. - I believe these > can be copied as is from the 5.x patch, but not sure about the > rules...). It can be applied to 4.14.236. If this is OK, I can move on > to 4.9 and 4.4. I do not know "the patch" is here. Please resend it in a format that I can apply it in. Look at the stable list archives for lots of examples of backported patches, they need to have the original changelog description as well as the git commit id of the patch you are backporting, which I do not see here at all. thanks, greg k-h