Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp296058pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyikc8QFF6tZ7suBlGWSyB7y9sZWbIXVbRDxYlpdCWCkzqrK68P6w2/Tlh2ufqjp0Ag3Nvs X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:524b:: with SMTP id t11mr3074558edd.327.1623836096967; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623836096; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P1+Uis5s2Ymiicwd7SoQz653DeOOI0Lf+8yitB2JG0Gai4r1ZJCcRHW1mwe3DA81cF 0miYcFnGYDwhQn7rBaJbXlxypdOb/ouHVhneDV41Rkhu2LEUBUnqiDlPygAcP8k05jo6 ilAZAjX38BOcExEMpMN4K9w+uw+2NVvOR1bXj1ow+CKAmcIAuLD/IUv6bn2PGSWgTDVX KTZ6fz36t0DSYN73T+vSTa+sdJbLQQtsLBs64iuof7Edromb3IOPD91ZVtj6NWQ8gHkW Dhep17xeIDCVokdsdTnHix9YIngUCjFQBcZ2iuQTo93WA0OCOrltNw+jg3sPOrENYjYa kubA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=VCpzNGuHYOQ13ewACg2DgEyoOaJ8pfQSHmc6JIXGlrM=; b=HJENsDAAJbJWJZ+HHh7Ug1YYS8l8pEuKKKxgXjeQXMur1u+tMAOphqDh2g05vGj4SD Jb2ch5H7rs8gnWOQS6yBkAZ2PplC1+qjL0QDMZ+8UYTzNqR1LFckpzwxroeuhwEiMim1 sOkyrVBYXW+xlzHx9KICH8jm4Cti+OivAAY7pQIbZpyC5EepZA1hHltVZeI7O43lpzuc OAuuytyrDIRDEK4UwyLFNkvmU1pDWWaC+FX7Uaodr3pKdFkiQpQMV/GCohRrQkgXxhJ5 usT+l7fbGKyhs4nYESY6cpnKUSr30BWEcMj4TN+sME6xIePAlVBh6aCa1ybn2meh4zz+ PjEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AJ6pMKDE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d2si1753326ejr.606.2021.06.16.02.34.33; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AJ6pMKDE; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232312AbhFPJfX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:35:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58076 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231316AbhFPJfX (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 05:35:23 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFB5C6128B; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:33:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623835997; bh=DkZ8F2jSZs+3/pVPCNqnHTKCaKdlQDSzZt4q7RgCxdk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AJ6pMKDE9t9ZnZJRvJOjB4INP3E6lxEZacDyI63j15PQs+GrXNLD1xuSmRCl54aQF 0plm4KV56D9nLN1K0A6l7KYG5n5AkDVQaNSEHkzRxSCsCYMyn7nHUk5T+CzcAwiEWd 6ug+HopT9Ky8ET+8pxSaJyjsipcEIeJCngmlqJrY= Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:33:14 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Amit Klein Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Willy Tarreau , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 175/244] inet: use bigger hash table for IP ID generation Message-ID: References: <20210512144743.039977287@linuxfoundation.org> <20210512144748.600206118@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:32:41AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:16:52PM +0300, Amit Klein wrote: > > Here is the patch (minus headers, description, etc. - I believe these > > can be copied as is from the 5.x patch, but not sure about the > > rules...). It can be applied to 4.14.236. If this is OK, I can move on > > to 4.9 and 4.4. > > I do not know "the patch" is here. > > Please resend it in a format that I can apply it in. Look at the stable > list archives for lots of examples of backported patches, they need to > have the original changelog description as well as the git commit id of > the patch you are backporting, which I do not see here at all. Also, did you test this on 4.14.y and prove that it is both needed, and works properly? thanks, greg k-h