Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <4f32f06306eac4dd7780ed28c06815e3d15b43ad.camel@trillion01.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: store back buffer in case of failure
From:   Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:42:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <b5b37477-985e-54da-fc34-4de389112365@kernel.dk>
References: <60c83c12.1c69fb81.e3bea.0806SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
         <93256513-08d8-5b15-aa98-c1e83af60b54@gmail.com>
         <b5b37477-985e-54da-fc34-4de389112365@kernel.dk>
Organization: Trillion01 Inc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 15:51 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Ditto for this one, don't see it in my email nor on the list.
> 
I can resend you a private copy of this one but as Pavel pointed out,
it contains fatal flaws.

So unless someone can tell me that the idea is interesting and has
potential and can give me some a hint or 2 about how to address the
challenges to fix the current flaws, it is pretty much a show stopper
to me and I think that I am going to let it go...