Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp757682pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCVu9QqK5ZWckFFbFxIhK6WmKw4gpam4nI4XTB+TA9/t1m0MNPIQgtsMVWI3lkD1FBwEpP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1068:: with SMTP id q8mr905173ilj.276.1623873276372; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:54:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623873276; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FxSC9hESr/TOO05DoIq/lQr2PhMTognCltUA+NBQEdjGKz/3Rzxi2o6E1k1O+FXOZn /9aa8CQNN3rYasE+X0hYoi8pXO4T0fdDv9JN8Lf6rBKZqjHbLhM+vpOEvlxfeDZ30j0T M+BS9MEQ7G5l8I3mBfqDw7ktGm9ABAm3MhoTneOSxDvgK/EYw7rE+lpzE+zp8wDGs4nk JwH/WAho2EWVdNWhKrJqhmnlgFmcbiuFOSY8LrUQpud5SfInetvU3VAKok0FFCAAFHxy wAoMBWCWZGbSsLOe0cOdmyTdpIWdyGtvpfrnFne2OblBiUr86n/JRFjDum6OSxEhv9DF qzCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=/F0HtkNFoORtTwjtlcnXXUF5aC8G0d6wrxRz+kn8kRA=; b=0XbjbsLb2eRs3C7UsqXpCmizVPDFG4Sc2c7bHseVu8N6QoakuUgULZQf84Mo3qdFk/ /7DnPh8Li9OnixWL2XL6qoA6RYH+t151cQwlYGIO6ZlQ2qSFUYUJpDdUmzC79EtwnUfU MLGZKst73+baL8PtqQt1mZYfOYslVQnlA3ot0kFs1kArRIptfRevED/G/WCBWfRsu8Z3 qkz7tcuINX3OAi8JzVvzynddJ57PPIsKNEWmgRKgG3z+IaG0asBqopiuDqtUXsUZ4bp7 wpqqH0kwTJZw1I6KPmu1ReIZBmyIpzKRRFCTqBJ5hsH4R6u+oKRg10zOVlB3710TgAn7 9K8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=F6j5X2zV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 187si3180004iow.86.2021.06.16.12.54.23; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=F6j5X2zV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233812AbhFPOKY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:10:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50644 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233720AbhFPOKS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:10:18 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F404611BE; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:08:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623852492; bh=2aQGGygYqMBN800GkiB8pEpJinuE3fBF9/Lon+/x4qg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=F6j5X2zVVBqiOt7qL2SNlgtxc32RsT3vSjmWEk8lDvC10S9V4dl3wKizrXrZi1VSI eo1NhiY//LCibxVFfJFCNAYBBEd/wzRwsNKhvEqK73umWjrs9NzuIUoA+qprwVmGjU taRnjHgFprhMAxnLOyPL1GBQLbXp94A5jDhA8FGe8UMV+Kod0Co3KjQ5q9/ACSyynD LILvaoJhZiU8ZpbW06OHdNfjbPwfT10XjGNft0WdVlELYm2efqx5oighxaG6IxwvOS wzpueNwk3EwvLvzsbWTiGsGX7jhc9gvTmCOruN5VQMqHIorTc/z/O6OerHCFA4CXR7 roD/SqkdEUiFg== Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id i12-20020a05683033ecb02903346fa0f74dso2560013otu.10; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SXsMR5kcPV+AegZ362cVZyE6iwO55pF9vOD0vTTLJRpMwfhIc V+HTm8IQmiBFMdyNks99J8m+Whe1GZWROaOXW24= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d63:: with SMTP id l3mr88138oti.108.1623852491651; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210614230457.752811-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210614230457.752811-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:08:00 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB To: Punit Agrawal Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Leonardo Bras , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , PCI , Alexandru Elisei , wqu@suse.com, Robin Murphy , Peter Geis , Brian Norris , shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Bjorn Helgaas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 01:05, Punit Agrawal wrote: > > Alexandru and Qu reported this resource allocation failure on > ROCKPro64 v2 and ROCK Pi 4B, both based on the RK3399: > > pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit] > pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01] > pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000] > pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit] > > "BAR 14" is the PCI bridge's 32-bit non-prefetchable window, and our > PCI allocation code isn't smart enough to allocate it in a host > bridge window marked as 64-bit, even though this should work fine. > > A DT host bridge description includes the windows from the CPU > address space to the PCI bus space. On a few architectures > (microblaze, powerpc, sparc), the DT may also describe PCI devices > themselves, including their BARs. > > Before 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource > flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), of_bus_pci_get_flags() ignored > the fact that some DT addresses described 64-bit windows and BARs. > That was a problem because the virtio virtual NIC has a 32-bit BAR > and a 64-bit BAR, and the driver couldn't distinguish them. > > 9d57e61bf723 set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for those 64-bit DT ranges, which > fixed the virtio driver. But it also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for host > bridge windows, which exposed the fact that the PCI allocator isn't > smart enough to put 32-bit resources in those 64-bit windows. > > Clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from host bridge windows since we don't need > that information. > > Fixes: 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses") > Reported-at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com/ > Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei > Reported-by: Qu Wenruo > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas > Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Rob Herring Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel > --- > Hi, > > The patch is an updated version to fix the PCI allocation issues on > RK3399 based platforms. Previous postings can be found at [0][1][2]. > > The updated patch instead of clearing the 64-bit flag for > non-prefetchable memory below 4GB does it unconditionally on the basis > that PCI allocation logic cannot deal with the 64-bit flag (although > it should be able to). The result is a simpler patch that restores the > input to the allocation logic to be identical to before 9d57e61bf723. > > Tested locally on a RockPro64 on top of v5.13-rc6. Please consider > merging. > > Thanks, > Punit > > Changes: > v4: > > * Updated Patch 1 based on Bjorn's suggestion. Also dropped the > Tested-by tags due to the change of logic > * Dropped patch 2 and 3 from the series as it's not critical to the > series > * Dropped the device tree changes (Patch 4) as they are already queued > in the soc tree > > v3: > * Improved commit log for clarity (Patch 1) > * Added Tested-by tags > > v2: > * Check ranges PCI / bus addresses rather than CPU addresses > * (new) Restrict 32-bit size warnings on ranges that don't have the 64-bit attribute set > * Refactor the 32-bit size warning to the range parsing loop. This > change also prints the warnings right after the window mappings are > logged. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210527150541.3130505-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/ > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210531221057.3406958-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210607112856.3499682-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/ > > drivers/pci/of.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c > index 85dcb7097da4..a143b02b2dcd 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/of.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c > @@ -353,6 +353,8 @@ static int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev, > dev_warn(dev, "More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n", > dev_node); > *io_base = range.cpu_addr; > + } else if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_MEM) { > + res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_MEM_64; > } > > pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res, res->start - range.pci_addr); > -- > 2.30.2 >