Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp31323pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:25:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL46fFUD7ZChFXXZ6PG4Q2zvktUd0z5FMg/S4cDCfocZ09wttAbuy99qPdQshuirN+8hhf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:974:: with SMTP id q20mr1742183ilt.0.1623896754379; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:25:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623896754; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eJrM/GWaIZoy8YzsbT78fgKr855FCyTx7ntxIHd1ipPpPgAL5XpAeE/yuAwpa0rqmz Vi3hq9YIsFi2/TzW2LuTly7VzuK56E+GzHxeNd+NNnBoe9WlKna2SaNEEZzGUNSdeMcr eSNqCYie4eLuJeszBoH7DKPYtg9zgOCODlYi6ltzKx62wETcIEKokq4OPeD3EJaDj6O4 yKGUDMPt7MoLxglYBNilTOsGLCf9tKGyHPWheZTlWPWMfjieRg4CwHjD7AtiefgjFSpg Wd/253P7TGPGBamhiHO97d8O/omot6fhfiGWsu+ZX22U4+1WMiLoJp1Ngnlu/7n8HtVK fNNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=ps+mzs5onslHDI+dnpIhDM2BoX/zDh+U15SPZVGxthY=; b=cvYZUgWx746GEHjN6KNXF7omY/x8Mqv7x8oawWtan+OCCRU3pkoDq9/zQBLQbI6klI wn5xoNQrgcCv3AwBO9y9LnHWeUOxwkNOWGLOiJJHjhOiAVn0d5baHJF4HYd5YLUTBqhm NnUWK0pcGhaQd7zU/1urebsmZ/rbcbLg2yMvOXiXUlaFGb+Xd73eXuKpqEvvjLFoJzAI VLpRTGPJr9alY6+wY1be4eYMOqgipkXWmWvGo0mlYkd7QZ7SVH9svBTpxtwtlqC7KzLL s9SwGLcQu6l17595hIXCkCoOG18TCRmJ3iYJApZz2br2O4FsumYM2fZAQ4aKXKAJ35hr CAfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=fs1u292t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9si4385736iom.21.2021.06.16.19.25.42; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=fs1u292t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234005AbhFPVfv (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:35:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232230AbhFPVfu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:35:50 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5662DC06175F for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id q10so4070011oij.5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ps+mzs5onslHDI+dnpIhDM2BoX/zDh+U15SPZVGxthY=; b=fs1u292toXegX6Dp8U7cg3JRI3hbuN3+WAUqzu10THK3OimialhN7XUz5BlF2KyXHq oACx9zopI58jrzEpOUvhWvD9ctWIjpWtmOKji0DsqJwayP+a1AiLd0o9VahRuybItjZU gVe6dZJek6EXrdJVBOKCuhDI9LjusqnIDMpyFkrEZOUccjlttFvAocjyDjsYpgwiMEHM ywR/A+SmFZ/2Z1IMTRzyrRip1fxqByYthP026VvIN6BsJmgorQuEfEAZIBzaGDjg+ZIp in1rXWJkaGy8LLsL+9vikNVX2PwEmKc3AFbr3aSym/FMg8j1KbKDpIF8snSXI7QR/eqH AGXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ps+mzs5onslHDI+dnpIhDM2BoX/zDh+U15SPZVGxthY=; b=pnzTRdJ1hwAzo8Q774LNqtvUvpQJczn7XyWLVAkI3Vo8vBk+O50nmUFdxstCqTwIN7 9GnnGszm9vdpJgRMMZYxeSTA5igeEvnr+3cVpNicH4XLGNt4GX/TqV2GpKi7ThSKjmeL Shua2vAKbJ6dU8i6kDaj9gPiBcvcEcI5pxLtlV4AJ8QfT3lTKeU/6Qyr7U0no780IJix 6umMUZd3cx9faNbtQWyNtoHFr6cI4cI0LhsFoXXq9J8DQCRDqo2muuDmd0QxpQ5RGvrn sqKWC4miterTBhWLEQT0Pjf2y9QjTZrgpPdw+ClOrWT4EwHvZ9I1YszlIFGV/bnT4tUK EIdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533z6Kb4VcPEHQ4yTfIFuSyo+DXlMVotQKkUERqjYPgMQ1nqCP4s oppyKMpO3w0mG8AX7NTM1l8P8szv/O8hCQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:4dc3:: with SMTP id a186mr8360124oib.63.1623879223473; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([198.8.77.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm702536oig.9.2021.06.16.14.33.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring: minor clean up in trace events definition To: Olivier Langlois , Steven Rostedt Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Ingo Molnar , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <60be7e31.1c69fb81.a8bfb.2e54SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <2752dcc1-9e56-ba31-54ea-d2363ecb6c93@gmail.com> <20210615193532.6d7916d4@gandalf.local.home> <2ba15b09-2228-9a2a-3ac3-c471dd3fc912@kernel.dk> <3f5447bf02453a034f4eb71f092dd1d1455ec7ad.camel@trillion01.com> <237f71d5-ee6e-247c-c185-e4e6afbd317c@kernel.dk> <1cf91b2f760686678acfbefcc66309cd061986d5.camel@trillion01.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <902fdad6-4011-07fc-ea0e-5bac4e34d7bc@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:33:41 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1cf91b2f760686678acfbefcc66309cd061986d5.camel@trillion01.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/16/21 3:30 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote: > On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 13:02 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 6/16/21 1:00 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote: >>> On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 06:49 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> >>>> Indeed, that is what is causing the situation, and I do have them >>>> here. >>>> Olivier, you definitely want to fix your mail setup. It confuses >>>> both >>>> MUAs, but it also actively prevents using the regular tooling to >>>> pull >>>> these patches off lore for example. >>>> >>> Ok, I will... It seems that only my patch emails are having this >>> issue. >>> I am pretty sure that I can find instances of non patch emails >>> going >>> making it to the lists... >> >> The problem is that even if they do make it to the list, you can't >> use eg b4 to pull them off the list. >> > Jens, > > I am unfamiliar with the regular tooling and eg b4 (which I assume are > part of the regular tooling) so I am not fully understanding everything > you say. Sorry, I could have been more clear. b4 is a tool that pulls patches off lists managed by lore.kernel.org, and I use it quite often to avoid manually saving emails and applying. It'll collect reviews etc as well, and I integrate it with git. That means, if you send a patchset of 3 patches with a cover letter, if I like the series I just do: $ git b4 and it applies it for me, adding links, reviews, etc. > My take away from all this is that it is very important that my patches > do reach the lists and I commit to put the necessary efforts to make > that happen. Yes. Both for tooling, but also so that non-cc'ed people see it and can reply. > My last email was simply myself starting diagnose where my problem > could be outloud. > > Steven did mention that he wasn't seeing the Message-Id field in my > patch emails. I'm very grateful for this clue! > > My main email client is Gnome Evolution (when Message-Id is present in > my mails) and I do the following to send out patches: > > 1. git format-patch -o ~/patches HEAD^ > 2. Edit patch file by adding recipients listed by > scripts/get_maintainer.pl > 3. cat patch_file | msmtp -t -a default Why not just use git send-email? That's literally what that is for. It's what I use to send out patches. > The weird thing is that when I have noticed that my patches weren't > making it to the lists, I started to Cc myself to receive a copy of the > patch. When I inspect the copy header, it contains the Message-Id field > but it might be the receiving email client that on reception does add > the missing field so I don't know exactly what is happening. > > you have my word. Next patch I send, it will be make it to the lists. > > thx a lot for your comprehension and your assistance! Thanks for sending out patches! -- Jens Axboe