Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423943AbWKHXIV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:08:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423871AbWKHXIV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:08:21 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:41434 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423943AbWKHXIU (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:08:20 -0500 Message-ID: <4552636E.3090809@pathscale.com> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:08:30 -0800 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ipath - program intconfig register using new HT irq hook References: <545156d49f883c43af70.1163024486@localhost.localdomain> <20061108144402.0b6a7b23.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061108144402.0b6a7b23.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 861 Lines: 27 Andrew Morton wrote: > so... Is this: > > htirq-refactor-so-we-only-have-one-function-that-writes-to-the-chip.patch > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers.patch You should drop the above patch from Eric... > htirq-allow-buggy-drivers-of-buggy-hardware-to-write-the-registers-update.patch ...in favour of this one, which is my rework of Eric's patch. > ib-ipath-program-intconfig-register-using-new-ht-irq-hook.patch > > considered 2.6.19 material? Yes, please. I might be able to simplify the ib-ipath patch (by a matter of a few lines), but it works fine as it stands.