Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:03:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87o8c4dikn.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
        <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce cache maintenance callbacks for guest stage-2
In-Reply-To: <8340be12-cc80-8c2a-3597-ecba05eaf35a@huawei.com>
References: <20210616095200.38008-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
        <20210616095200.38008-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
        <87eed2lzcc.wl-maz@kernel.org>
        <8340be12-cc80-8c2a-3597-ecba05eaf35a@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:48:29 +0100,
"wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> On 2021/6/16 21:21, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Hi Yanan,
> > 
> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:51:57 +0100,
> > Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> To prepare for performing guest CMOs in the fault handlers in pgtable.c,
> >> introduce two cache maintenance callbacks in struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops.
> >> 
> >> The new callbacks are specific for guest stage-2, so they will only be
> >> initialized in 'struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops'.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 7 +++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> >> index c3674c47d48c..302eca32e0af 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> >> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ typedef u64 kvm_pte_t;
> >>    *			in the current context.
> >>    * @virt_to_phys:	Convert a virtual address mapped in the current context
> >>    *			into a physical address.
> >> + * @flush_dcache:	Clean data cache for a guest page address range before
> >> + *			creating the corresponding stage-2 mapping.
> > Please don't reintroduce the word 'flush'. We are really trying to
> > move away from it as it doesn't describe what we want to do.
> I agree with this. I intended to make the names short and laconic, but this
> missed the information about the callback's actual behaviors.
> > Here this
> > should be 'clean_invalidate_dcache' which, despite being a mouthful,
> > describe accurately what we expect it to do.
> Sure, I will change the name as you suggested.
> > The comment is also missing the invalidate part, and we shouldn't
> > assume that this is only used for S2 mapping.
> Ok, will refine the comment. I think something like"Clean and invalidate the
> date cache for the specified memory address range" may be generic enough.
> >> + * @flush_icache:	Invalidate instruction cache for a guest page address
> >> + *			range before creating or updating the corresponding
> >> + *			stage-2 mapping.
> > Same thing here; this should be 'invalidate_icache', and the comment
> > cleaned up.
> Thanks, I will also correct this part.
> 
> Besides the callback names and comments, is there anything else that still
> needs some adjustment in the other three patches? :)

It looks pretty good so far, much nicer than the previous versions.

I have a small nit on the last patch, which should be dead easy to
address. I'm currently running a bunch of tests, hopefully nothing bad
will come out of it.

If you respin it shortly, that nothing fails, and unless someone
shouts, I'll queue it for -next.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.