Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp259249pxj; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:59:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtRmdVFv2dd8zP8Bh9m/52DWk4GrGAOuHWwA5u5X3rPIUUzAblUpg5LQuSywmd9AE15Ox2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4f10:: with SMTP id t16mr4000978eju.337.1623920399433; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:59:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623920399; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mWn7LklTLK8rmjz9q0klb3PP/fIdYSA/l0WfpWM35H+UZWHq37xBqrqqt1cLMtRqF8 pJ2ipcqcfqa4q8y0ZMuAjWzQnU1SLk1V9+v+EuVSyaEWaTZyCSUYkhg06tTWyBPP4WoJ AJP+ZODxlaFKbaprI62t1vNd72LK83xcO02UTAphZ9Au4Dszay7r35+Engy0TZnR/l2O K0caxQ2uBYFiHldF/YTJqH9kxjllWxFo2R9PrVXZgpD3iqjHq64JX22MRHZGC3MTalJ4 h8woRWU6P2n/1tiPfRLWBW1THOMZVPAGRVE8uimHh0/9jv46kXwZL5NN/djIpVW3StN2 50cw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=7Yo70YsPumIqbOfBUtfdyUvY/t4rndd7y0b3na3Mh20=; b=eEo6EEhg1rWiJbz9elkEIuuY5QvlXrCNWiLXIQCQ34ZtlMj0E1KR5GKRQTA/F55PeG Kj0opq4+oE2pWRmgf0wBJDEZkLsiZ71Ad+XJ00Bgwk3cB8cBYXoV+5KZCYDKlcJo6+Pw HPOLLsWJE9TtzzQr0C9nC+wJ7cqBKvXIY1vojDZ97U77JkmjZT6d7nDLkfd4NEyQDAqr i4oPBy9Xc+TJ/jLx3TnSvY4cxi7HZRxTjx1AQNmuT7/WedsY6ESm6VaSPm2Ncc72CyL0 8eXHYswWhOmN5a+UUli9KrrENRDtt6D//OIzwr9oFFhunlgvOPkwYkrvzZHc9g1VPQb/ O2UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h24si5895344ejt.474.2021.06.17.01.59.36; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231261AbhFQJAs (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 05:00:48 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50444 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230052AbhFQJAr (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 05:00:47 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304F91042; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.57]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B86EF3F694; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 01:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:58:36 +0100 From: Qais Yousef To: Xuewen Yan Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Patrick Bellasi , Tejun Heo , Quentin Perret , Wei Wang , Yun Hsiang , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/uclamp: Fix uclamp_tg_restrict() Message-ID: <20210617085836.lpfeuvzcbsqkgtmi@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20210611122246.3475897-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Xuewen On 06/16/21 11:06, Xuewen Yan wrote: > Hi Qais > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I tested the patch on the "UNISOC T610" platform, and it looks fine. > > According to the two cases: > case1: > without patch: > set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as: > [ 215.780435]c6 uclamp_test : > pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=819 > > after set tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%,the result: > [ 420.580443]c6 uclamp_test : > pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=512 > > with patch: > set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as: > [ 333.533878]c7 uclamp_test : > pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=614,eff_max=819 > > after set tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%,the result: > [ 430.813789]c6 uclamp_test : > pid=138,req_min=614,req_max=819,eff_min=512,eff_max=512 > > case2: > without patch: > set task's clamp_min=614(60%), clamp_max=819(80%), the result as: > [ 169.700544]c0 uclamp_test : > pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=0,eff_max=209 > > after set tg's cpu.uclamp.min = 30%, tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%,the result: > [ 246.500634]c7 uclamp_test : > pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=307,eff_max=209 > > with patch: > set task's clamp_min=0(0%), clamp_max=209(20%), the result as: > [ 169.700544]c0 uclamp_test : > pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=0,eff_max=209 > > after set tg's cpu.uclamp.min = 30%, tg's cpu.uclamp.max = 50%,the result: > [ 179.933868]c6 uclamp_test : > pid=137,req_min=0,req_max=209,eff_min=307,eff_max=307 Thanks a lot for trying it out. Cheers -- Qais Yousef