Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp320757pxj; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJANRgJZts2Yh/bN6ywcibtecIQ/2SNdQyvZfRFyVndwpmZeLgH9CquhoaeD471bIEpStI X-Received: by 2002:a5e:db02:: with SMTP id q2mr3284792iop.103.1623926059058; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:34:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623926059; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cwAD6iDXTFm+GMsYCIx2IrLZ2tFvNO4uT4xWRorXJjg+iMP9u0gzg4QK1vlTCvUWSX cz1Sp8ZMPSD6/3K+NZYfUSSXtq1vVDx21y6VSp8IWeuJZjhIvIFSjxf+4ZVi8jK4jwFJ /fhnrS+1sUAdztk8NnOIbbF5rww/rdACflsJESsLvk0xjGnWMpO1MjHXb+3BUyyFB17b JnUSv1EQ1Z6asiHz04s2829bzIxgoMmDWobgxTf7PkMGcJZiTkdSSzDJEXxPxKiVxYHe bqwXn0ynIM6PskZRljDWhzsEonJTKtYXwMOrMg0q1UBnBHTnqxCTDnRq9/KwV/Eeizuw 7jAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=CLldBjGPoXQqB2VNplVLAbsWwu/gfZkGWS5T/49E/Fw=; b=Z0CqFoGE6FbPuJIL0m2t35Umfl58t7+WiQ0w7A8jF2AjGZ0ZOw7uZYQH01hxBFt/cF GHRuQlL4McVst2jpc/cadLfCW+kqHOUiCKAe0oZqlQKD14I3adNLU2TLiTtpXk1HJDP5 LSlz91y33o0vxcE7CCrWaiErlJ2yTS+V7UbUlbza5QJSRO6IxE1mZOg1rBctfFzxggbm LZoAC23EyRhxJygRrlleRjdVRQFY8JGbGAx39+OUBtxlWeju2fNq1p3ol1NEpffML2xS jh5+IrjeiUeDBAUCH2IIS/c3hEZwCQ3ak6RunVQCy0lOIkhJzpypTetbva3jAYSeUS9Q mEYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AOCrY5pG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d198si5841055jac.70.2021.06.17.03.34.06; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 03:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AOCrY5pG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231567AbhFQKfF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45176 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229868AbhFQKfE (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:04 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A88AD613C1; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:32:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623925976; bh=5LFrWKKnZzvh/4r7zdfHzAVLWRjA2NAS61Xo1SiDMzI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AOCrY5pGzfLkyz4h4F84W9YSr/0KuhYp1X/v/mxaY2Hy5HcyNwhpNjuFt7pbjjDcQ J+JCu2P6VyaatyRM6QXSOQDuGs8lsj3LAh+atXDFv5iaab5ONSkJo5jQ1SVwgg3kAj 2TGwsiaN9+pAg55Ls3zmKq+dghYhO5bp9IxjyPcA= Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:32:53 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Sherry Yang Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "bp@alien8.de" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/2] Backports "x86, sched: Treat Intel SNC topology as default, COD as exception" Message-ID: References: <20210608003715.66882-1-sherry.yang@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:59:46PM +0000, Sherry Yang wrote: > > > On Jun 7, 2021, at 5:37 PM, Sherry Yang wrote: > > > > Could you also backport these two commits > > adefe55e7258 ("x86/kernel: Convert to new CPU match macros") > > 2c88d45edbb8 ("x86, sched: Treat Intel SNC topology as default, > > COD as exception") to 5.4.y? > > > > Commit adefe55e7258 ("x86/kernel: Convert to new CPU match macros") > > is a prerequisite of the second commit. There are conflicts while > > cherry-picking commit adefe55e7258 ("x86/kernel: Convert to new > > CPU match macros"), which are caused by a later commit > > c84cb3735fd5 ("x86/apic: Move TSC deadline timer debug printk"). > > Keep the later code base. > > > > Alison Schofield (1): > > x86, sched: Treat Intel SNC topology as default, COD as exception > > > > Thomas Gleixner (1): > > x86/kernel: Convert to new CPU match macros > > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 32 ++++++------- > > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > arch/x86/kernel/tsc_msr.c | 14 +++--- > > arch/x86/power/cpu.c | 16 +------ > > 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.27.0 > > > > Hi, > > We have seen that the warning “sched: CPU #20's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on > the same node! [node: 1 != 0]. Ignoring dependency. ” applies to 5.4 but we don’t > observe the fix in 5.4. I'm sending this email to apply the fix from upstream > 2c88d45edbb8 ("x86, sched: Treat Intel SNC topology as default, COD as > exception") to 5.4 and also resolve the dependency conflict caused by > prerequisite commit adefe55e7258 ("x86/kernel: Convert to new CPU match > macros”) by keeping the later code base, please refer to the > previous two patches for the detail. > I have no idea what you want me to do here, sorry. Please provide a working, tested, set of patches backported to the relevant stable trees you want to see them applied to, and I will be glad to review and queue them up if they look good. No one here is in the position to "resolve the dependency conflict" of anything here for you, sorry, you will need to do this yourself as you are in the best position to do so. thanks! greg k-h