Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754801AbWKIJVm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:21:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754800AbWKIJVm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:21:42 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35734 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754798AbWKIJVl (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:21:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:21:31 +0100 From: Olaf Kirch To: Tim Chen Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@sunset.davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: Volanomark slowdown Message-ID: <20061109092131.GA19715@suse.de> References: <1162924354.10806.172.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1163001318.3138.346.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061108162955.GA4364@suse.de> <1163011132.10806.189.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061108221028.GA16889@suse.de> <1163023652.10806.203.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1163023652.10806.203.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 638 Lines: 16 On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:07:32PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > In my testing, the CPU utilization is at 100%. So > increase in ACKs will cost CPU to devote more > time to process those ACKs and reduce throughput. Oh, I see. I would test on a real network with real clients. I doubt you would observe a noticeable effect there. Olaf -- Walks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Must be a chicken. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/