Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754709AbWKIJkJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:40:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754814AbWKIJkJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:40:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:59831 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754709AbWKIJkH (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:40:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:36:45 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Jesper Juhl , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version. Message-Id: <20061109013645.7bef848d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1163064401.3138.472.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <9a8748490611081409x6b4cc4b4lc52b91c7b7b237a6@mail.gmail.com> <1163024531.3138.406.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061108145150.80ceebf4.akpm@osdl.org> <1163064401.3138.472.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1722 Lines: 45 On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:26:41 +0100 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 14:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:22:11 +0100 > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > > - A while back, akpm made some statements about being worried that the > > > > 2.6 kernel is getting buggier > > > > (http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6069363.html). > > > > > > and at this years Kernel Summit actual data > > > > Not true. 70% of surveyed users had hit a new kernel bug. > 70% of surveyed users hit ANY kernel bug. Not "new bugs" > Including "my new wizzbang hardware doesn't work" and "I'll try > something new, oh looky a 4 year old bug" and "this new feature isn't > quite mature yet now that I try it". > > One of the things that happened was during early 2.6 udev broke left and > right ABI wise. We've gotten a lot better at that, and that's the kind > of bug that hits a really wide audience. > > Statistics can be misleading ... bigtime. > 83% of the people also said things were not getting less reliable in > 2.6. > 70% hit a bug 1/7th think it's deteriorating 1/4th think lkml response is inadequate 3/5ths think bugzilla response is inadequate 2/5ths think we have features-vs-stability wrong 2/3rds hit a bug. Of those, 1/3rd remain unfixed 1/5th of users are presently impacted by a kernel bug Happy with that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/