Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210617194154.2397-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com> <20210617194154.2397-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210617194154.2397-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:33:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFBinCC4_bsTEwj5+=iH-ZF3LpSzSjN-x44Yr_XU4R9=Wzq-Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv1 1/8] phy: amlogic: meson8b-usb2: Use clock bulk to get
 clocks for phy
To:     Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Anand,

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:42 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> +       int                                             num_clks;
> +       struct clk_bulk_data                            *clks;
personally I'd get rid of the num_clks as this value is static
instead I would add a #define with the number of clocks and then...

>         struct reset_control                            *reset;
... use something like:
struct clk_bulk_data                            clks[MESON8B_USB2_PHY_NUM_CLKS];

[...]
> +               dev_err(&phy->dev, "Failed to enable USB clock\n");
clock -> clocks

[...]
> +       priv->num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(meson_phy_clks);
> +       priv->clks = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, priv->num_clks,
> +                                 sizeof(*priv->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!priv->clks)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
by using a fixed-size array as suggested above you don't need to
dynamically allocate memory anymore


Best regards,
Martin