Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:34:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:34:19 -0500 Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.62]:63213 "EHLO snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:34:00 -0500 Message-ID: <01b401c16beb$792d40e0$0a00a8c0@intranet.mp3s.com> Reply-To: "Sean Elble" From: "Sean Elble" To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fran=E7ois_Cami?= Cc: , "John Alvord" , In-Reply-To: <00c701c16bd2$e4b11800$0a00a8c0@intranet.mp3s.com> <3BF06B44.1040709@wanadoo.fr> <015101c16bdc$e633dbe0$0a00a8c0@intranet.mp3s.com> <3BF07147.5050503@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:32:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The feature freeze certainly seems to be an important part of things . . . now we just need to determine what we want to happen during and after the feature freeze. :-) I certainly think Linus' Linux should be in a CVS tree, and he should patch to that; in addition, other developers, like Alan Cox, should have commit access to the tree, but Linus has already shown that he doesn't want that. Either way, I say "testing, testing, testing!". :-) ----------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster ReactiveLinux.com (Formerly MaximumLinux.org) http://www.reactivelinux.com/ elbles@reactivelinux.com ----------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fran?ois Cami" To: "Sean Elble" Cc: ; "John Alvord" ; Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:03 PM