Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424184AbWKISIm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:08:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1424183AbWKISIm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:08:42 -0500 Received: from cattelan-host202.dsl.visi.com ([208.42.117.202]:37602 "EHLO slurp.thebarn.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424184AbWKISIl (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:08:41 -0500 Subject: Re: XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+ From: Russell Cattelan To: "Igor A. Valcov" Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JuSEL1a0MCem7VzSRDyt" Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:08:35 -0600 Message-Id: <1163095715.5632.102.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1-1mdv2007.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 57 --=-JuSEL1a0MCem7VzSRDyt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 20:30 +0300, Igor A. Valcov wrote: > Hello, >=20 > For one of our projects we have a test program that measures file > system performance by writing up to 1000 files simultaneously. After > installing kernel v2.6.16 we noticed that XFS performance dropped by a > factor of 5 (tests that took around 4 minutes on kernel 2.6.15 now > take around 20 minutes to complete). We then checked all kernels > starting from 2.6.16 up to 2.6.19-rc5 with the same unpleasant result. > The funny thing about all this is that we chose XFS for that > particular project specifically because it was about 5 times faster > with the tests than the other file systems. Now they all take about > the same time. >=20 > I also noticed that I/O barriers were introduced in v2.6.16 and > thought they may be the cause, but mounting the file system with > 'nobarrier' doesn't seem to affect the performance in any way. >=20 > Any thoughts on the matter are appreciated. I would try verifying the problem on a non ide disk just to confirm the write barrier theory. Also file a bug. http://oss/sgi.com/bugzilla include test case and hard description if possible. >=20 > Thanks in advance, --=20 Russell Cattelan --=-JuSEL1a0MCem7VzSRDyt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFU26jNRmM+OaGhBgRAv3EAJoD46oZI7tAel8SFTVxfYRbC8gXXACff0ge /N33Dq1iluQOkxKfZWacUIw= =PPqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JuSEL1a0MCem7VzSRDyt-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/