Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:44:51 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 11/18] virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for
 SOCK_SEQPACKET
Message-ID: <20210618144451.6gmeqtfawdjpvgkv@steredhat.lan>
References: <20210611110744.3650456-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
 <20210611111241.3652274-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
 <20210618134423.mksgnbmchmow4sgh@steredhat.lan>
 <20210618095006-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210618095006-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:51:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:44:23PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> Hi Arseny,
>> the series looks great, I have just a question below about
>> seqpacket_dequeue.
>>
>> I also sent a couple a simple fixes, it would be great if you can review
>> them:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210618133526.300347-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/
>
>So given this was picked into net next, what's the plan? Just make spec
>follow code? We can wait and see, if there are issues with the spec just
>remember to mask the feature before release.

Yep, the spec patches was already posted, but not merged yet: 
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202105/msg00017.html

The changes are quite small and they are aligned with the current 
implementation.

Anyway, I perfectly agree with you about waiting and mask it before 
v5.14 release if there are any issue.

Thanks,
Stefano