Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754798AbWKITWI (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:22:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754832AbWKITWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:22:07 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:26085 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754798AbWKITWD (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:22:03 -0500 Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version. From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jesper Juhl , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: <20061109111212.eee33367.akpm@osdl.org> References: <9a8748490611081409x6b4cc4b4lc52b91c7b7b237a6@mail.gmail.com> <1163024531.3138.406.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061108145150.80ceebf4.akpm@osdl.org> <1163064401.3138.472.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061109013645.7bef848d.akpm@osdl.org> <1163065920.3138.486.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061109111212.eee33367.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:21:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1163100115.3138.524.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 (2.8.1.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1715 Lines: 42 On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 11:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:52:00 +0100 > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > Do you have the > > impression that high quality bug reports on lkml (with this I mean ones > > where there is sufficient information, which are not a request for > > support and where the reporter actually answers questions that are asked > > him) are not getting reasonable attention? > > Yes. > > And why does the report quality matter? because it matters where people spend their time. And if you count bugreports that are actually distro support questions and then say "but these aren't looked at" it's not fair either. > If there's insufficient info you > just ask for more. and that does happen. And half the time people just remain silent :( I know I look at a whole bunch of bugreports in areas that I work on. I see a lot of other people doing something similar. That doesn't mean nothing slips through. I'm sure stuff does slip through. I would HOPE it's really obscure things only; but I fear it's also cases where the reporter didn't put the right people on the CC as well ;( > But we all know that and nothing's going to happen so there's really not > much point in discussing it. I have 270 saved-up-lkml-bug-reports to > process. -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/