Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <2760706369e7401dd794339e3f22859c243272ea.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix issues in check_irq_usage()
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:36:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20210618170110.3699115-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (sfid-20210618_190144_566235_DE7F4D24)
References: <20210618170110.3699115-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
         (sfid-20210618_190144_566235_DE7F4D24)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Boqun,

Great, thanks! I'll ask the folks who could reproduce this issue to do
so as soon as possible.

Not sure if you saw my previous posting:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8a61ecda99843307018e3e71a5540682436443fc.camel@sipsolutions.net/T/#u

That was with patch 3 of this set already applied.


If I understand correctly, then you're basically saying that if we apply
all the 3 (or 4) patches here, it'll just change the report (that you
can see at the link above) to actually say something that I can
understand to see where the issue is?

Thanks,
johannes