Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161851AbWKIV6Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:58:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161854AbWKIV6Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:58:24 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:42500 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161851AbWKIV6X (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:58:23 -0500 To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Christoph Raisch , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/4] ehca: hcp_phyp.c: correct page mapping in 64k page mode X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <17746.52343.815568.368590@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:58:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: <17746.52343.815568.368590@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (Paul Mackerras's message of "Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:36:39 +1100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2006 21:58:22.0108 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C530DC0:01C7044A] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 517 Lines: 14 > So Roland is correct in his comment about how ioremap is called. Umm, so is this patch really needed? Where did the patch come from -- is it needed to fix something actually seen, or was it written just based on some theoretical understanding? I'm confused... - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/