Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3611704pxj; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 02:40:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTexIa5hPSEcbQFzhNkxBjmn6SMGV4x737tXkbQYPMRbxfntiWxnkt2ELcu1KuB+73Oymn X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7714:: with SMTP id n20mr18410403iom.126.1624268449638; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 02:40:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624268449; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EKjFeAOq+cvI2B8KUxOZWToaahnsRjQ4Ytg4BekU7ZMRjGO/UygN4foMNaOSp2KgKm hzMet1NNdFLgEPYWfrVXZA/CHxTVsjcu0e+auOU9/oQ+jnkYzLcqJM6eosWy4MJwjx5+ rML2UAj5R1MMMUytlSH/RCR1OB3YW21pbO6F4AP+wahQODwUMK/lJ4x0Xwj8C1oS6Sc9 bGqCWRsZfYiIYk3IdCvrt85i+CQNXvRByz7b0HJcR3Ag8YjwPL/S/UqitKSEs2nXte05 jFcTBddo90++jpAD9MPQLDBSA1VDYlAT9ObViuorCPyE5/wnK4uxKICY0TRracf/fbDj 7nDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Y5Z2EhFw732snnRLxYWcKNe1ENW9MVcT07jbuCjSaFQ=; b=zVP+cEXJlxhFoYVprjPG/DuNzLzb3WJejOjr1Fl8DoG0zzH/yMe+v2yZoc4l4fujCc jHTyk76RAhqSGZiryAVdglotC/FbdsTalMxGcy4+i8fq/vff3WC9yF6WKI+T5Q5ebRCD WPgAYszjS4nF+UMPmPFqdFOnC78GObGJN7NNvUYNUYFow+thWlhFrQ/iw9FmodhRuUWZ EDGsaTADHbfF2IxfcnlmjwI8GexbdiL4zVkBydvTux9P/AKcZPDZdBBaBqtnmUFnDh/4 SmqTsgvFBAV9mO5GWJEbe+Xgxv7JuCDumncsQxzeg2s0MJJJFaFdXfRpqF0WEvLBz9Mp oCzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f39si14031623jav.78.2021.06.21.02.40.38; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 02:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230332AbhFUJmT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:42:19 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3291 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229661AbhFUJmT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:42:19 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G7kpP3MN4z6H6hX; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:32:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:40:02 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , , , , CC: , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH] evm: Check xattr size misalignment between kernel and user Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:39:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20210621093923.1456675-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.204) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The kernel and the user obtain an xattr value in two different ways: kernel (EVM): uses vfs_getxattr_alloc() which obtains the xattr value from the filesystem handler (raw value); user (ima-evm-utils): uses vfs_getxattr() which obtains the xattr value from the LSMs (normalized value). Normally, this does not have an impact unless security.selinux is set with setfattr, with a value not terminated by '\0' (this is not the recommended way, security.selinux should be set with the appropriate tools such as chcon and restorecon). In this case, the kernel and the user see two different xattr values: the former sees the xattr value without '\0' (raw value), the latter sees the value with '\0' (value normalized by SELinux). This could result in two different verification outcomes from EVM and ima-evm-utils, if a signature was calculated with a security.selinux value terminated by '\0' and the value set in the filesystem is not terminated by '\0'. The former would report verification failure due to the missing '\0', while the latter would report verification success (because it gets the normalized value with '\0'). This patch mitigates this issue by comparing in evm_calc_hmac_or_hash() the size of the xattr returned by the two xattr functions and by warning the user if there is a misalignment. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c index 96b22f2ac27a..462c5258322a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry, size_t xattr_size = 0; char *xattr_value = NULL; int error; - int size; + int size, user_space_size; bool ima_present = false; if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) || @@ -276,6 +276,12 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry, if (size < 0) continue; + user_space_size = vfs_getxattr(&init_user_ns, dentry, + xattr->name, NULL, 0); + if (user_space_size != size) + pr_debug("file %s: xattr %s size mismatch (kernel: %d, user: %d)\n", + dentry->d_name.name, xattr->name, size, + user_space_size); error = 0; xattr_size = size; crypto_shash_update(desc, (const u8 *)xattr_value, xattr_size); -- 2.25.1