Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3799044pxj; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:55:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpzHqmxNB/I7dm1gQJytkxvDVbibkKR14ifxippv7Bnq5K3qTIafo+4X1TMUxpaM21XJoG X-Received: by 2002:a92:190f:: with SMTP id 15mr17127502ilz.45.1624283720466; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:55:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624283720; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fPlKDrOAcgJxb5ecTQRIR98G1LBHttKZMIYzD6N2kA4LEqISjBAzSg2UVslpX/QvDr RDHLVnsvppcaFt7jQ1NQAHx8+O9apZQFo7FSsa72mZF1FM5nW74+wtpoWyiRraCV/D2p U1Yq2SSfDeEMSKUihYG3yysOB/HYf/i/tCHglXDLbuYbGlIkGp5c1qLvfFIy9Bl8xjUf 6jPTIA6H1XcCWZacUDgSJeJaAa1sfN6S2Cjo+9mWLpGdFvCIusm221I1+6p0cx09IZsU C1qEyQk13QNKBphknYPeArEWaPMxEBth5/TxB640eoEX5sb2O0O8oTL3zIFNF3YfaAdE 4qHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=W6MGuavx6twbb/Q17ohA/BfaVJ/Bc9SFHn9Ch8eWwEM=; b=whc0mx/0wZz/NiDrObEfDH2ygwaA0NN4mbxW1YZIinG7IKTQbMgSradQQI8QqeRPXQ TsNBUyzjzpqtnXmrbXGYlgPJZ77c0UTkYtMk2BP41vQ2dLPQ6LFzMGQQR46YrE+hvAhU NC3PGn7kHi/DQwrMEhKGC9R7gROWiluJtUNtDS4ff7oTs3NacZDNfuL8y6XH+tTVYpQz TdkRUikNQvbK2ASSFp7EjAkbQEJu99JGYxmaMoFkCYQybseu3KigU8/pE8ALRkLEX7Cu Bz3D33p/uWZWfyyumlrVj67lI9DnwOpAXJPjRHyg0EBcTAzCMvOeKJBmzbrwT45N+jJv Rd/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZTgJRx9O; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y5si14462554ilu.5.2021.06.21.06.55.08; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZTgJRx9O; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230180AbhFUN4w (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:56:52 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:45249 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229747AbhFUN4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:56:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1624283677; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W6MGuavx6twbb/Q17ohA/BfaVJ/Bc9SFHn9Ch8eWwEM=; b=ZTgJRx9OcWTz6nl9MmvBc8RINEwDCwiFHZtQTXXiQMM6nEZt81uMuvMyG0n1RL54WA7VuN 7xLla8vCzhvL8ckL+o9S6mG3BXPVQ9RDidgoXO0m2Ycijuq6XHv0ohbL/gKyVLe4C3btsh C3vHRgVYRNm8zr1Bb3G2NtvhOOTyZGA= Received: from mail-ot1-f72.google.com (mail-ot1-f72.google.com [209.85.210.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-402-YvNAKIvJO7GBa4r5tH31sA-1; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:54:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YvNAKIvJO7GBa4r5tH31sA-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f72.google.com with SMTP id e16-20020a0568302010b02903feaaa5cf10so9293809otp.8 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6MGuavx6twbb/Q17ohA/BfaVJ/Bc9SFHn9Ch8eWwEM=; b=bicfYkSCWZuaLJJTyOYnt6STD1G2NMXFdVqHTUsEfdezPUf1a9Bu9ePb9Wuu62bIpF /GywtIEnTjVCGTrCOGlT9ZYsdXVx3ql9DLqk4BTg85oT6gBgbkQoCdDh79vQMkYAbiIU TOUOeXio9ZhSc7AVfI0UA47tE+abV98sSPP7xc12/7EozIwCepXVWNANImx/IZY+CO1G xLRHh59Hx79dqpIwaZFJw9dCIJFWneMluw5ZGm2z8m37U345GHvTTsObVpzh/2g15sd4 qkyFMblkFUezCTO4d692enGsavis+AvdBMAgJEPgYoMhP4zQazxb24asZ9twalrCYKxS ukbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531p6KdKlATxbgDrH2fLFR8ZS+XZcRLDYy0AqTWqtq2vmpDNDDFr 07sZsCGE+fAbXAX2dkQJykE8sOiaOJv5frNiuo/M+X1Yt6bGZsSG9YIgkzOORBw6vvTh0N+xPLO RSCZ9T7ebk8JMEMMd4m0ZzwqOoEvOeqaLoc18lttotQS/deII4uld0E9kMJmNL/6FiZMDvb9+LQ == X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6484:: with SMTP id g4mr20666955otl.331.1624283675264; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6484:: with SMTP id g4mr20666933otl.331.1624283675020; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.173] (ip68-102-25-99.ks.ok.cox.net. [68.102.25.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12sm1232858ooh.38.2021.06.21.06.54.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 06:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: Send FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID for killpriv v1 To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210423151919.195033-1-ckuehl@redhat.com> From: Connor Kuehl Message-ID: <74f1eff1-570d-03b1-7a27-1ec343c5c3ab@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:54:33 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/21/21 3:26 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 17:19, Connor Kuehl wrote: >> >> FUSE doesn't seem to be adding the FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID flag on write >> requests for FUSE connections that support FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV but not >> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2. >> >> However, the FUSE userspace header states: >> >> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV: fs handles killing suid/sgid/cap on >> write/chown/trunc >> ^^^^^ >> >> To improve backwards compatibility with file servers that don't support >> FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2, add the FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID flag to write >> requests if FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV has been negotiated -OR- if the >> conditions for FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 support are met. > > > If server does not support FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2, then it does not > support FUSE_WRITE_KILL_SUIDGID either. The two were introduced > together and the latter is only meaningful if the > FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 feature was negotiated. > > What am I missing? You're not missing anything, this patch is wrong. Let's nack this. Thanks! Connor