Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   =?UTF-8?q?=C3=8D=C3=B1igo=20Huguet?= <ihuguet@redhat.com>
To:     ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ihuguet@redhat.com, ivecera@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] sfc: error code if SRIOV cannot be disabled
Date:   Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:32:36 +0200
Message-Id: <20210621153238.13147-2-ihuguet@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210621153238.13147-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>
References: <20210621153238.13147-1-ihuguet@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

If SRIOV cannot be disabled during device removal or module unloading,
return error code so it can be logged properly in the calling function.

Note that this can only happen if any VF is currently attached to a
guest using Xen, but not with vfio/KVM. Despite that in that case the
VFs won't work properly with PF removed and/or the module unloaded, I
have let it as is because I don't know what side effects may have
changing it, and also it seems to be the same that other drivers are
doing in this situation.

In the case of being called during SRIOV reconfiguration, the behavior
hasn't changed because the function is called with force=false.

Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
index a5d28b0f75ba..84041cd587d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
@@ -402,12 +402,17 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_enable(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+/* Disable SRIOV and remove VFs
+ * If some VFs are attached to a guest (using Xen, only) nothing is
+ * done if force=false, and vports are freed if force=true (for the non
+ * attachedc ones, only) but SRIOV is not disabled and VFs are not
+ * removed in either case.
+ */
 static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev = efx->pci_dev;
-	unsigned int vfs_assigned = 0;
-
-	vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev);
+	unsigned int vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev);
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	if (vfs_assigned && !force) {
 		netif_info(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "VFs are assigned to guests; "
@@ -417,10 +422,12 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
 
 	if (!vfs_assigned)
 		pci_disable_sriov(dev);
+	else
+		rc = -EBUSY;
 
 	efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching(efx);
 	efx->vf_count = 0;
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 
 int efx_ef10_sriov_configure(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs)
-- 
2.31.1