Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281467AbRKMEhB>; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:37:01 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S281468AbRKMEgv>; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:36:51 -0500
Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:54725 "EHLO math.psu.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S281467AbRKMEgs>;
	Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:36:48 -0500
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:36:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols???
In-Reply-To: <200111130421.fAD4LbZ17072@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0111122325050.22925-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:

> Are you being deliberately obtuse? Your "that would explain a lot"
> comment is an obvious insult.

I'm absolutely serious and yes, by now I consider the possibility
that you _really_ don't bother to read the core kernel code as very
probable.  Style incompatibilities give a very plausible explanation -
I certainly can understand why somebody used to common kernel style
can have trouble reading code in your style and vice versa.

The question still stands, BTW - should your "...I would be unable to
read..." be taken seriously?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/