Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3987041pxj; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4JrKygYxI29jJPCXV4S2zXeRU4ZRBlBXWiUV8Bol/Qge1l94cq+5a6L/1lOHAAPa6GvYZ X-Received: by 2002:a92:d7c8:: with SMTP id g8mr14184140ilq.117.1624297877927; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:51:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624297877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CsmP6GXWGY/HgQsQkgRNxpJtPzSs3dEqd3ghFjOaOU7SwcaHp6kpfNkB6C2XyxQvOu eRojF/16kdJl0/wUbN9m2JK5xAli6BOD5FTvhoNzCf7hKSbtr4NnNXtyCZQpOLBK0pMo L2VyxnkCzuuw6V53MERrOlyNCFfcxzFHBFoOvwc6/qcxP4DtWg0/x+8sLeus5FaQ2VVC Pwof5+nURLH7FM4fx8eojtsxBtypq7d3lSFoCkqlKojLNhbAwnFU2jZHQgkCWts620eV ijEZ4cBnJp/lrI/qPwqlR6iDPakVeLuLijiPbEyy5s4K8jr4Ut0z0H834N3O8o0hq7sb kTHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=0QYGl9t3B61p3R4Pfjr060utSFzWiSQkdLXIYb/zDdU=; b=0ffInHQAY3+ViuqV7HagnH6gnD1uO5NHpne5HVOaGdPJhz1JtGRqMYUxJsJNnIlDJR uYKTCsB555nCZuFxfABzGvO8wh6NiCf7UK+TDDsg7W2FMJeEYeRY0AqFejFE5CzfS7Vi +C6xUdRYuqMJJZoqH3ewYYf15ScqR1k/vbLeq65Tmz//q55GGvNJ2viyYMdUkNuwxxvi ZqNe83LoHWbx1tlZ3TPYPH0vgC+X44EiUq/9QkB3S3oVJqw/P9nRLy8kWyCzaq0Hdv2t IyIiFKfyJGxcJeVvD93xzQjIZbg7/gD0LSAJ3kWhXJOUEHRtQSVE6Ay7E0eOo/aTCzUq OZZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vQO+htf2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w16si21253862jaq.100.2021.06.21.10.51.05; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vQO+htf2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231432AbhFURwT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:52:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48216 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230330AbhFURwS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:52:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79742C061574 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id f70so32543683qke.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0QYGl9t3B61p3R4Pfjr060utSFzWiSQkdLXIYb/zDdU=; b=vQO+htf2wJiurDmp/ETx8qrS2CmegvFArWxmNRlTd53GO3BL2uXW+476bbAtRdYUFv fEsY6OoIVJs10HLvz23S12dlzvHszeIwF6GO551jBl8WEE+LGFCY7K4xbrULjQ/Eq0hY NXaMinlAkA+NgtTuTBLv5PhO6a/Bxa9YBt1PJvuzJb4dAg3K9Gyv5UU8olcIf7JWUgFl 69/W4pCrc6556Y/QNohnlHZXxki8z5KuEdyZcgDRHWO3HZzxC+ey0bB1MM1veRGQSxth SMmpPWf5ouZ09Rqa4V/LpyEa23oS1ztdts+Dr9DtZhKOjLI3zoTu1ygx5Xy1VhcsT5oK huzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0QYGl9t3B61p3R4Pfjr060utSFzWiSQkdLXIYb/zDdU=; b=kyZ3s7db+sPo+GDUAOmc/IMAsMKc7sVQIrVd8sfaLxjcW2Dt0trITRj3dP1zgUYaaD /In5znWxV52QQ3t/ZsI3c7DHVVE1FvvcDDwzvWXCvaAPMilQj1vsh/gWP6Nwgi+dWeuq Y9rnCbEezq81J9yp6AHerHUmfVBiS7lHEwieQ9kkBqh0+TUCMBLuEDuJKk9sRJUQaKOx qAyRLKPe/PtLNKcIQd8ubeTS9kctfnhap9y6QViq76MqrUJTFUuVqL4QfzL6xKQedQru WwvoZxq92bo1WIM5bq+Aa1w6G0E4n+8jueClFNDysX/dJZb9DeH/v1P45Ig3JKoKPP44 nV7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530U+Qn/4BQiXfD9gFaVt4CUnP1XaTcB+fpyQnpp1uLx15+iNKdv 1/eGWmAGTxI04VAWLfV/iaDmD6vbSktlNs2uq1EtsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a25:4181:: with SMTP id o123mr12807053yba.23.1624297802325; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:50:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210617212654.1529125-1-surenb@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Suren Baghdasaryan Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 10:49:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] psi: stop relying on timer_pending for poll_work rescheduling To: YT Chang Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Benjamin Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Minchan Kim , Tim Murray , =?UTF-8?B?V2VuanUgWHUgKOiuuOaWh+S4vik=?= , =?UTF-8?B?Sm9uYXRoYW4gSk1DaGVuICjpmbPlrrbmmI4p?= , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team , show-hong.chen@mediatek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:31 AM YT Chang wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 14:26 -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > Psi polling mechanism is trying to minimize the number of wakeups to > > run psi_poll_work and is currently relying on timer_pending() to > > detect > > when this work is already scheduled. This provides a window of > > opportunity > > for psi_group_change to schedule an immediate psi_poll_work after > > poll_timer_fn got called but before psi_poll_work could reschedule > > itself. > > Below is the depiction of this entire window: > > > > poll_timer_fn > > wake_up_interruptible(&group->poll_wait); > > > > psi_poll_worker > > wait_event_interruptible(group->poll_wait, ...) > > psi_poll_work > > psi_schedule_poll_work > > if (timer_pending(&group->poll_timer)) return; > > ... > > mod_timer(&group->poll_timer, jiffies + delay); > > > > Prior to 461daba06bdc we used to rely on poll_scheduled atomic which > > was > > reset and set back inside psi_poll_work and therefore this race > > window > > was much smaller. > > The larger window causes increased number of wakeups and our partners > > report visible power regression of ~10mA after applying 461daba06bdc. > > Bring back the poll_scheduled atomic and make this race window even > > narrower by resetting poll_scheduled only when we reach polling > > expiration > > time. This does not completely eliminate the possibility of extra > > wakeups > > caused by a race with psi_group_change however it will limit it to > > the > > worst case scenario of one extra wakeup per every tracking window > > (0.5s > > in the worst case). > > By tracing the number of immediate rescheduling attempts performed by > > psi_group_change and the number of these attempts being blocked due > > to > > psi monitor being already active, we can assess the effects of this > > change: > > > > Before the patch: > > Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 > > Immediate reschedules > > attempted: 684365 1385156 1261240 > > Immediate reschedules > > blocked: 682846 1381654 1258682 > > Immediate reschedules (delta): 1519 3502 2558 > > Immediate reschedules (% of attempted): 0.22% 0.25% 0.20% > > > > After the patch: > > Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 > > Immediate reschedules attempted: 882244 770298 426218 > > Immediate reschedules blocked: 881996 769796 426074 > > Immediate reschedules (delta): 248 502 144 > > Immediate reschedules (% of attempted): 0.03% 0.07% 0.03% > > > > The number of non-blocked immediate reschedules dropped from 0.22- > > 0.25% > > to 0.03-0.07%. The drop is attributed to the decrease in the race > > window > > size and the fact that we allow this race only when psi monitors > > reach > > polling window expiration time. > > > > > The regression power data points of Android phone in home screen idle: > Original :baseline > Original+ Patch : -21.5% (-11.5mA) Ok, so this fixes the regression and then some (original regression was +10mA and with the patch we've got -11.5mA). This must be the contribution of the additional logic I added to avoid resetting poll_scheduled when we know that the polling window is not yet over (line with /* Polling window is not over, keep rescheduling */ comment). > Tested-by: SH Chen Thanks! > > > Fixes: 461daba06bdc ("psi: eliminate kthread_worker from psi trigger > > scheduling mechanism") > > Reported-by: Kathleen Chang > > Reported-by: Wenju Xu > > Reported-by: Jonathan Chen > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > > --- > > include/linux/psi_types.h | 1 + > > kernel/sched/psi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > -- > > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h > > index 0a23300d49af..ef8bd89d065e 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/psi_types.h > > +++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h > > @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct psi_group { > > struct timer_list poll_timer; > > wait_queue_head_t poll_wait; > > atomic_t poll_wakeup; > > + atomic_t poll_scheduled; > > > > /* Protects data used by the monitor */ > > struct mutex trigger_lock; > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c > > index cc25a3cff41f..fed7c9c2b276 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c > > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void group_init(struct psi_group *group) > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&group->avgs_work, psi_avgs_work); > > mutex_init(&group->avgs_lock); > > /* Init trigger-related members */ > > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0); > > mutex_init(&group->trigger_lock); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->triggers); > > memset(group->nr_triggers, 0, sizeof(group->nr_triggers)); > > @@ -551,18 +552,14 @@ static u64 update_triggers(struct psi_group > > *group, u64 now) > > return now + group->poll_min_period; > > } > > > > -/* Schedule polling if it's not already scheduled. */ > > -static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct psi_group *group, unsigned > > long delay) > > +/* Schedule polling if it's not already scheduled or forced. */ > > +static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct psi_group *group, unsigned > > long delay, > > + bool force) > > { > > struct task_struct *task; > > > > - /* > > - * Do not reschedule if already scheduled. > > - * Possible race with a timer scheduled after this check but > > before > > - * mod_timer below can be tolerated because group- > > >polling_next_update > > - * will keep updates on schedule. > > - */ > > - if (timer_pending(&group->poll_timer)) > > + /* cmpxchg should be called even when !force to set > > poll_scheduled */ > > + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&group->poll_scheduled, 0, 1) != 0 && > > !force) > > return; > > > > rcu_read_lock(); > > @@ -574,12 +571,15 @@ static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct > > psi_group *group, unsigned long delay) > > */ > > if (likely(task)) > > mod_timer(&group->poll_timer, jiffies + delay); > > + else > > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0); > > > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > } > > > > static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group *group) > > { > > + bool force_reschedule = false; > > u32 changed_states; > > u64 now; > > > > @@ -587,6 +587,23 @@ static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group > > *group) > > > > now = sched_clock(); > > > > + if (now > group->polling_until) { > > + /* > > + * We are either about to start or might stop polling > > if no > > + * state change was recorded. Resetting poll_scheduled > > leaves > > + * a small window for psi_group_change to sneak in and > > schedule > > + * an immegiate poll_work before we get to > > rescheduling. One > > + * potential extra wakeup at the end of the polling > > window > > + * should be negligible and polling_next_update still > > keeps > > + * updates correctly on schedule. > > + */ > > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0); > > + } else { > > + /* Polling window is not over, keep rescheduling */ > > + force_reschedule = true; > > + } > > + > > + > > collect_percpu_times(group, PSI_POLL, &changed_states); > > > > if (changed_states & group->poll_states) { > > @@ -612,7 +629,8 @@ static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group > > *group) > > group->polling_next_update = update_triggers(group, > > now); > > > > psi_schedule_poll_work(group, > > - nsecs_to_jiffies(group->polling_next_update - now) + > > 1); > > + nsecs_to_jiffies(group->polling_next_update - now) + 1, > > + force_reschedule); > > > > out: > > mutex_unlock(&group->trigger_lock); > > @@ -736,7 +754,7 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group > > *group, int cpu, > > write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq); > > > > if (state_mask & group->poll_states) > > - psi_schedule_poll_work(group, 1); > > + psi_schedule_poll_work(group, 1, false); > > > > if (wake_clock && !delayed_work_pending(&group->avgs_work)) > > schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ); > > @@ -1235,6 +1253,7 @@ static void psi_trigger_destroy(struct kref > > *ref) > > */ > > del_timer_sync(&group->poll_timer); > > kthread_stop(task_to_destroy); > > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0); > > } > > kfree(t); > > }