Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4032450pxj; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:54:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNFIn8tYEtqTeksofF+UGSuLjBer+BN9Z3sgoBBLZrBlUy3eg/sgH2CuJUF74DDcL/jwSI X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee13:: with SMTP id g19mr19215686eds.147.1624301655607; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:54:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624301655; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wm9CieUG2D3IJZuRPYwL7dbDS2NzVGX3HRn6g4Ha9pEDi59iVWIZHNSFyXsAA/Whzq 5ykO9ckKgvbNl0hRK/r4S0PZcCVgpdoWtq1LHbXr9uTUnL5/kwbYkC8ySVpBEoUxO0KY WrB19obQUYfFHWTvHN4QdnBokRygQPFbmcCIIeFgGbg1Zbjlbn0TRImUFY2Pmyp8+f3F y/1sjkfAgBkru1W8oByyl5JyIGn798iJFXP8lO4ik6fEe4T/8QYuOTlsCrL1KpyQoi4P jKluzpjZ+UJvRu+YkfeeBrNhIqEs425uvkwSg5E/N7KuUaRjuyVe8p6PIV87GM7faFNC k1yQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Su81jZ58rhgHEJ5xNq4SVnXH+2VzVF+NBRidhz73D1A=; b=J89i/5dH46T/cknYXQBg/FrlZpYuvGW7gNNrpqOB6lfzF8+vLr82mw4LMo7xZ63sDx qKcokSTix7t0ZQFUEXnLcVrEuhPGrrR2G78aI+5fYBywBD4hIhKTrkdeX2UYMayNoK3o 3B95+LVwbcXABgsdVrCQFybNGonJZopPMxYgVspxTXrCuqDUaXYCFwHL59yEe4yjF2ZG rpPvnNgUwquuLXvJsxPRbcdJ6y9Q5iI8wdXh0de8wN2L4GXscGU8TAZYNHE+ckzNAc/u +kFUbjYxZgi/C2SJL5BPzj0doVAHKNdgiH2Xpm9MABPacudzZ39T33gBKbPgjxdSQt89 OZlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fj1t9s64; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p31si21921386edb.554.2021.06.21.11.53.52; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fj1t9s64; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231977AbhFUSwq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:52:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231386AbhFUSwp (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:52:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E46FC06175F for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id dm5so18102995ejc.9 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Su81jZ58rhgHEJ5xNq4SVnXH+2VzVF+NBRidhz73D1A=; b=fj1t9s647G21SEyRURvGSz0x9wtmxJ1tZ8/CUue9B6KUosAd6dSoUS60m96cQ+7eyu X+YDOnrvGr+bsP98c9Ca2GgLJ+1qdkFzpx1kZ4FjC9sSbmixe3cBrCy5j7iiA/8H78Ad qWzJYPTfCuC5c+PUdeApqrOKftevo3P8yumqzO/0U21y4euK6bSiWWRwcW6CnM20ymWn pngu/blLd7uK6hsKweTMDWkfmorb5VY9mnJDNM5UXnw3AqND/Bg88L0a/8/8CI1sTioU NjhPSc1Q63+MzLtw8gnM6sknXv0ioUMK76/Z/kE4nBov+x0xRP9UtXsfzDXe0v2gU9Kb N7iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Su81jZ58rhgHEJ5xNq4SVnXH+2VzVF+NBRidhz73D1A=; b=FJVJXuWRwRRb4N+PUK3YXx4oNcSCQwNQotfEpbNPi+Bk7u9Uuk17YLvLb3HK6OiA9j Y/Fk41VfOt/ckJMgLwrp4AovvuH9ooEt1hh+1nuqJrHwYwBlQzv5TCabNiNi55zqfJ3k 0pyTG2QUuHTNCyU8TyHWj0eZvqyWV/nIEyjZRLo8un9fbSpDAJjaCTiz1RstpJG9AZG6 IQCMo57Fl73QcpJUlDiHtXISLzwnUJ8HvGFSCzK05Je5HSBdCcXbLvO98ACjIDC43HU8 eDzp+v0viyNt5lPlB1MNwZvRLfnvfFzjXoRBt5yavItxSZj1UBCLBrfqbKbplCe/GxDk OIrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533utnQNV3qOdy2Cq+nQ7U1bDuuAB6wuVIsns5RhsVyUOPHEW0t9 sNZpEirvSSaNMQa6msML0BFDIZnXllfAzGJLWraX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e108:: with SMTP id gj8mr25315960ejb.90.1624301428439; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210618233023.1360185-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20210618233023.1360185-3-ndesaulniers@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bill Wendling Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Kconfig: CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR, depend on for GCOV and PGO To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Peter Oberparleiter , Kees Cook , Peter Zijlstra , Bill Wendling , Sami Tolvanen , Masahiro Yamada , Miguel Ojeda , Nathan Chancellor , Luc Van Oostenryck , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , Rasmus Villemoes , LKML , clang-built-linux , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Borislav Petkov , Martin Liska , Jonathan Corbet , Fangrui Song , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Dmitry Vyukov , Johannes Berg , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver , Linux ARM , linux-s390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:22 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:23 PM Marco Elver wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 01:30, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > > > We don't want compiler instrumentation to touch noinstr functions, which > > > are annotated with the no_profile function attribute. Add a Kconfig test > > > for this and make PGO and GCOV depend on it. > > > > > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YMTn9yjuemKFLbws@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/ > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YMcssV%2Fn5IBGv4f0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/ > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers > > > --- > > > init/Kconfig | 3 +++ > > > kernel/gcov/Kconfig | 1 + > > > kernel/pgo/Kconfig | 3 ++- > > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig > > > index 1ea12c64e4c9..540f862b40c6 100644 > > > --- a/init/Kconfig > > > +++ b/init/Kconfig > > > @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ config TOOLS_SUPPORT_RELR > > > config CC_HAS_ASM_INLINE > > > def_bool $(success,echo 'void foo(void) { asm inline (""); }' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null) > > > > > > +config CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR > > > + def_bool $(success,echo '__attribute__((no_profile)) int x();' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null -Werror) > > > + > > > config CONSTRUCTORS > > > bool > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > > index 58f87a3092f3..19facd4289cd 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > > +++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL > > > bool "Enable gcov-based kernel profiling" > > > depends on DEBUG_FS > > > depends on !CC_IS_CLANG || CLANG_VERSION >= 110000 > > > + depends on !X86 || (X86 && CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR) > > > > [+Cc Mark] > > > > arm64 is also starting to rely on noinstr working properly. > > Sure, > Will, Catalin, other arm64 folks: > Any thoughts on requiring GCC 7.1+/Clang 13.0+ for GCOV support? That > way we can better guarantee that GCOV (and eventually, PGO) don't > touch noinstr functions? > > If that's ok, I'll add modify the above like: > > + depends on !ARM64 || (ARM64 && CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR) > Wouldn't "!ARM64 || CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR" be more succinct? > to the above hunk in v2. Oh, looks like arch/s390 also uses noinstr. > Same question applies then: > > + depends on !S390 || (S390 && CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR) > > Or, we could just do > > + depends on CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR > > Though that will penalize architectures not using noinstr, that still > would like to use GCOV with versions of GCC older than 7.1. Perhaps > there are no such such users, or they should consider upgrading their > tools to we can stick with the simpler Kconfig? Thoughts? > > > > > This should probably be a 'select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL if > > CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR' in the relevant arch/../Kconfig. > > > > Alternatively, using: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YMcssV/n5IBGv4f0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > > > But I'd probably not overcomplicate things at this point and just use > > ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL, because GCOV seems to be a) rarely used, > > and b) if someone decides to selectively instrument stuff like entry > > code, we can just say it's user error. > > > > > > > select CONSTRUCTORS > > > default n > > > help > > > diff --git a/kernel/pgo/Kconfig b/kernel/pgo/Kconfig > > > index d2053df1111c..26f75ac4c6c1 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/pgo/Kconfig > > > +++ b/kernel/pgo/Kconfig > > > @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ config PGO_CLANG > > > bool "Enable clang's PGO-based kernel profiling" > > > depends on DEBUG_FS > > > depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_PGO_CLANG > > > - depends on CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 > > > + depends on CC_IS_CLANG > > > + depends on CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR > > > help > > > This option enables clang's PGO (Profile Guided Optimization) based > > > code profiling to better optimize the kernel. > > > -- > > > 2.32.0.288.g62a8d224e6-goog > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers