Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:04:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:04:43 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:47497 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:04:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:03:49 -0700 Message-Id: <200111130503.fAD53ns17951@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alexander Viro Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols??? In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200111130437.fAD4b2j17329@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > And the coding style used elsewhere in the kernel is revolting to > > me. More importantly, it's harder for me to parse than my own style. > > And you consider my comment as a personal attack? Wow. It fits a pattern. > > I shouldn't have to constantly stumble over an appalling coding style > > in my own code! > > No, you shouldn't. For those of us who have similar problems with > reviewing your code patch (later - CVS or RCS) will appear on > ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro/ tommorrow. End of story. So is this the hostile takeover you've mentioned? Even though I'm addressing the devfs races you've complained about so often, and have been releasing these patches, you still wish to pursue this hostile action? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/