Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4526780pxj; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzww+WI7q5I8M96SIkzXHlp850/4m7rJF8iTfTfKu2SEj4COfSpSxOD7RiUdDfmMnW/rGPY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4f13:: with SMTP id t19mr2865960eju.163.1624353152969; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624353152; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bJ/boXVnHP0Cs3cAbSdj8Nn205dydOJsxSMZbFxzcNXieXKBrRXZZk8V6t+afvuY4i KE18fV5MwEAb3oGStxiE809stszek1c7DO5nAryzrmWKP1O7zdkVjNkkSF2rTU5EsXX9 sKIThzjHjxbnZ8IXIxDoIb3z8RxxiuGh/HjeAEKYL2w0vB+EznIn27abz2IfdXgTgvKz 9YGh8REDwhiYmWf0HhRutXtLhUzMlHhReHXPQSvolsXgSHctBABePRDEZVCZczrnCWdO tlkA0da6rHpb9m7YjdXG2DoJ1rfvXcOjgtVvHOzb9z8IgP8SjVabG/jcNhZXlW8whTt0 B9Qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=CpVayGWDD5jCjOsDFgbodGAhFkKfuv5XGWD7w7SebTM=; b=sNAPOKGjm1UctBJe0bE49umEL9M7aAb5XLaSsoTiPAyoLUfP0xpgafCLN84cnb3pR2 oDF8X2hW7Gz7PhkFiotXg+5ptkxZU0WK0IDSHYQA2SHs2D1zM9BqSK18Pbtdqv0erdv0 PyZC47nL+zifOtjyMNjcn3TnMwz/E06wAmly1Vwqft3Zz4y3DUiIQsCAR99Zw3pxBT87 77HJzaRgEBvXokR3s6a3rlUnNf58HI5yfi/I1fUAjiIJ3UgCKb1HZ2Z/46v4D8MYZ3oq YnhUoXvBcQP3UgqrHJpdLWsEIHKt0+ggEUIThD49zL69X+cBrl2tQoGB30J04TobI0IK N+/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="2R1/CleI"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=kqPPEE7X; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zd20si6281934ejb.16.2021.06.22.02.12.10; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="2R1/CleI"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=kqPPEE7X; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229718AbhFVJLM (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 05:11:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229668AbhFVJLL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 05:11:11 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A05C061574 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1624352924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CpVayGWDD5jCjOsDFgbodGAhFkKfuv5XGWD7w7SebTM=; b=2R1/CleI7KOMUBqtuusPHNeBMyB6LQW23QPGGjCQZvQ0Gu1F5g27502eLEXYsIptF0rt2a wFXNgg3XyBG6ewdHMW1VmxCc3MGP0g7PgSqc24FhbZE4sEL0qHwmNZxbkV3e19pF+jZNQQ ZVL9VeYqf9YFoxGChCOYTmoaynoFcIkfaQYp2RRSuG2XU8bSo5vhhzMGYPjwLkoWk60cuW 505IOY8i6xYQWJurLi5DhjnRL33vp7xdu9IhaISgVmewqkYkLjA2uFszN/E3EGEE4y/h9d 2fs4u9TpFNBtvW0bxQV+WKLDxjJ6ohry5GsNzc4I/Ernfr0GnALVnaGSuf9SlA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1624352924; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CpVayGWDD5jCjOsDFgbodGAhFkKfuv5XGWD7w7SebTM=; b=kqPPEE7X6YDcM7f4Bc1ElGjkw5V0cvl+ZcwqnvLAfjy3YlwWAhRzZff+Y52vnYnYgjfvjL s2+Xj7eFKHetLXAg== To: Oliver Sang Cc: LKML , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , "Yu\, Fenghua" , "Luck\, Tony" , "Yu\, Yu-cheng" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Kan Liang , "Li\, Aubrey" , "Xing\, Zhengjun" , "Tang\, Feng" , "Liu\, Yujie" , "Si\, Beibei" , "Li\, Philip" , "Du\, Julie" Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/66] x86/fpu: Spring cleaning and PKRU sanitizing In-Reply-To: <20210622015937.GB687@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> References: <20210618141823.161158090@linutronix.de> <20210622015937.GB687@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87wnqme06c.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oliver, On Tue, Jun 22 2021 at 09:59, Oliver Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:18:23PM +0800, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git x86/fpu > > 0-Day kernel CI tested this branch from performance view, > choosing some sub-tests from will-it-scale (detail as below), since we > thought if the branch has the impact of fpu ops, will-it-scale should be > able to catch it. > we also plan to add stress-ng for new round test. > could you suggest if any other suitable test suites? and what's the most > proper sub-tests in will-it-scale and stress-ng? Hard to tell. Anything scheduling heavy will exercise these code paths. Thanks, tglx