Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4807906pxj; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:26:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyW6LPSqeOnizZFS+20XJF5Ktba4qHZwrmkAxLZq+IDBld3Ur95QL3nk14+6F/ukEo31DQW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1bab:: with SMTP id n11mr2822243ili.95.1624375607463; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:26:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624375607; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XQRdJRp9FV/b1VWIfD+jipABcR5Pw0quMf7o8+Cs6kdL7HLzRcXWOl4c5bgeLXMq4s JFeHsJ8lRHui67IM95KD9AOOT7gzW9h5w6j7OVhThWqrU6LF4q23APJ3XQ+h01Tl7La7 /nwPAJHSWB0GdiUJCZ7C3vXcFkHhXHlC5a5SYxiryq8kTRNhQ2zd1N3Dv4vKJ11iebcN QHpOxyZ8oWlnEm9pqKLSy5/wpLPBAVcwR/2n6b2Owt66DB9f6ulU8h3oaH0W3HbZxqij bTQfYc2W+frSUUtaUsA7ar3AtgnerA+RqHYczevpc0UMsN9eAfti5TizETzMX5dQ3OY5 5yQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=aIPBn8WNG2k/kH9lU1YDcGj3yG4aY+EBOlO4PsUvqjk=; b=rb8HCTeU6Eq4xgXxVUTjjQL2wa72ALMg2NfW5v7157pPbDFjRX/QyTt8E9WJqwfN6c 5l9MTHK9TYqALrETaK8n0jBoVPBSWfNNLPLmD87GMpBbMA3n37aGRKfi3jjwXvWQdw7t N6GOWRiVT+LWqneUfP4uOz63OfK9vQzBFIOjc9ANjp4+LSAOqfww8RaOgAFfYSQVtXId 7cqbTT3QWnAszTAj6HTK7qrAiJUPYv8H4lHhwsL7DisIEAEFO/wxrOs5QT6dL8fZMqfA pnoCTw3WWFSjiCAo8fjo/VfmPWvmNhp5jznT9uvgLpy1G43DPrZ21Cpj/l3q1Nd4M6bV WLSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k14si26437331jav.115.2021.06.22.08.26.34; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232330AbhFVP2R (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:28:17 -0400 Received: from p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.192.105]:39185 "EHLO p3plsmtpa06-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231815AbhFVP2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:28:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([96.237.161.203]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id viAjleA5hyubKviAklUeJx; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:18:42 -0700 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=avN3tQVV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60d1ff52 a=Pd5wr8UCr3ug+LLuBLYm7w==:117 a=Pd5wr8UCr3ug+LLuBLYm7w==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SEc3moZ4AAAA:8 a=WtrXtaRitKTu45twBd0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=5oRCH6oROnRZc2VpWJZ3:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: tom@talpey.com Subject: Re: [SMBDIRECT][PATCH] missing rc checks while waiting for SMB3 over RDMA events To: Steve French , Long Li Cc: CIFS , LKML References: From: Tom Talpey Message-ID: <1241844c-c9ab-2055-a363-80db63a4dd22@talpey.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:18:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfHuI+aivFMuuZGehMwo60U0hMxx4SRlZRovOfkVEQV+DSNr7Xsgr24M1GrRqkHKlEcIEK+uWkTiIMKBUCjvZ58HFuk8/Dd/oXj4kDTj8r+LIbJTT9Wgw uCxr9bQrLlMcs9Gi98JmKYOsxS7kwHj5xyQKsK+BbVYVRkoyp96CPTa6hGbejTDjrtsLWkRg0yQ/8trMfUgSgZyhFdcx1CoroewBJRQsFS4yT1Zld/TuvfBs bZ6vADug7cS7eXqCfY/CXUStivJNypo3m9iBNrrE/DmlV7ezTzfNA55513B31uhc Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/21/2021 5:32 PM, Steve French wrote: > There were two places where we weren't checking for error > (e.g. ERESTARTSYS) while waiting for rdma resolution. > > Addresses-Coverity: 1462165 ("Unchecked return value") > Signed-off-by: Steve French > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > index 10dfe5006792..ae07732f750f 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > @@ -572,8 +572,11 @@ static struct rdma_cm_id *smbd_create_id( > log_rdma_event(ERR, "rdma_resolve_addr() failed %i\n", rc); > goto out; > } > - wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > + rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > &info->ri_done, msecs_to_jiffies(RDMA_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT)); > + /* -ERESTARTSYS, returned when interrupted, is the only rc mentioned */ Suggest the same comment text as the one below, this one seems uncertain. > + if (rc < 0) > + goto out; > rc = info->ri_rc; > if (rc) { > log_rdma_event(ERR, "rdma_resolve_addr() completed %i\n", rc); > @@ -586,8 +589,10 @@ static struct rdma_cm_id *smbd_create_id( > log_rdma_event(ERR, "rdma_resolve_route() failed %i\n", rc); > goto out; > } > - wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > + rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( > &info->ri_done, msecs_to_jiffies(RDMA_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT)); > + if (rc < 0) /* e.g. if interrupted and returns -ERESTARTSYS */ delete "and"? > + goto out Missing a semicolon. ^^^ > rc = info->ri_rc; > if (rc) { > log_rdma_event(ERR, "rdma_resolve_route() completed %i\n", rc); > > One meta-comment. There's no message logged for these ERESTARTSYS cases. That might be confusing in the log, if they lead to failure. Reviewed-By: Tom Talpey Tom.