Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:33:19 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
        mtosatti@redhat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] timers: Make sure irq_work is handled when no pending
 timers
Message-ID: <YNIe38WaY0lOTEAZ@krava>
References: <20210610125945.558872-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com>
 <20210610125945.558872-2-nsaenzju@redhat.com>
 <87mtrmeqon.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <YNHpN1h5hEZdt+Au@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YNHpN1h5hEZdt+Au@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:44:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 12:47:04AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > There are two solutions:
> > 
> >   1) Create a IRQ_WORK softirq and raise that
> > 
> >   2) Simply delegate it to a workqueue
> 
> IIRC someone was looking to stick the whole thing in a kthread_worker.
> Jiri, was that you?
> 

yep, I still plan on doing that

jirka