Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:44:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:44:46 -0500 Received: from mail120.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.80]:31051 "EHLO imf20bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:44:35 -0500 Message-ID: <3BF0B32F.EB6BD32D@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:44:15 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Gooch CC: Alexander Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols??? In-Reply-To: <200111130503.fAD53ns17951@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <200111130535.fAD5ZKa18694@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Gooch wrote: > In fact, given the other code in the tree that doesn't conform to > CodingStyle, it makes sense run lindent on the whole tree and make > that available. As long as people understand that they should generate > patches against the real tree, and not the lindented one. We are slowly Lindenting the -real- tree, actually. So, no, that doesn't make sense. See my mention of long-term maintainability earlier... WRT to other code, devfs is indeed being picked on, because devfs -clearly- needs other eyes, and devfs is so far from current CodingStyle. Readability of devfs is IMHO far more important than the readability of drivers/scsi/random_isa_driver.c. -- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/