Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5575914pxj; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:32:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8fMWDFvHeo0ZHU2EH7Qf4bTQoai42kca3ryxlN4HC3xKBN36V03L1q9jv6ClmEnCSUBzl X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:33a2:: with SMTP id h34mr8519032jav.60.1624447939206; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:32:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624447939; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T5kUaKKA+UxbcB/I4CcPN9Q82V4wlrgDKqslcQL2Z7knY18EAXfytrPWPWg+FJNsUh WoyAG7HumzR+Y+YTYnJDblppd9n4rRDl/S6U+zrJNKpBkmWXPcPIljqXYdGu6w7E2Qrd 9B3sXj7aKE4xAQNWL28hC67K2gOKLjf1+fFYo1A1qYGBYVTyPIWq2e2qAkEoalADIXYY OkeNht3jc5aCUKTq5VaQaLyCAOSzYEJnLAJA6vAfXMoMLIRr3XT+calNWMiol4V6myf6 OdQpWVJWvQFTQ6I/O/gN5kFLbQl1BTYNtt9RGXGDMl4WcYgqoksZElZ7M7KvFWZrkXEB Q+3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=kyV08rMmmvEQF3eJw4Z6JVOY9gBgkXpDBjcpnJt2ooo=; b=KEmmY3kVy4BGDbnC0Vsb9TljDzKhhzdjuYaGLN9nxcUpHiFV9nuFhQ/MKHQ1/8UR5/ isPucVMizAKxE2o12MBHko71+DwxAyF3WgEwxWjt5tPbw2vBm7yloqeLhxMUzPsBZqDi Qjvfm6qOZmBUuQMi35d14EjSDPOAoCm7oZTPU/BT/fMpUHXKlYeI/4R4wGWUhDFxbD1u LHNOBmHpsRas7faG4mFRBgpPv3PS9wcGtjpIIrmy8j0/n1sv2zzLKguTOdWPl5wRr5SV nAG+mC7lCwvalMIWuD+KebcPQrDOi/cmp28WJB4u2B0ULbykvfQd/BYC19wSbXkEzPd+ MNrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fc72iwVZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i15si17864962ila.101.2021.06.23.04.32.06; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fc72iwVZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230455AbhFWLc4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:32:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:59824 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230274AbhFWLcw (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:32:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1624447835; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kyV08rMmmvEQF3eJw4Z6JVOY9gBgkXpDBjcpnJt2ooo=; b=fc72iwVZoxrY999gVSev4t6stJWfhQYWeZPtTNMF1+aZ/RVcD2gcgF9i9NAzpLjzi43qMj G2NevYzdVVJxNUhGag99YfSCc+bsH4cI72Izi8cKZwtB/1Wnul8MQC8RLFUMEd9loC8c56 trtWKYRoNxo1EKl8h3/3Z9QseOaolK4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-181-kUK3cQYnNMuZQgkmnNVfTQ-1; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:30:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kUK3cQYnNMuZQgkmnNVfTQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194E6800C60; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.40.192.10]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A72C5D740; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:30:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxim Levitsky To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Joerg Roedel , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)), x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)), Jim Mattson , Maxim Levitsky Subject: [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: svm_set_vintr don't warn if AVIC is active but is about to be deactivated Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:29:57 +0300 Message-Id: <20210623113002.111448-6-mlevitsk@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210623113002.111448-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> References: <20210623113002.111448-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It is possible for AVIC inhibit and AVIC active state to be mismatched. Currently we disable AVIC right away on vCPU which started the AVIC inhibit request thus this warning doesn't trigger but at least in theory, if svm_set_vintr is called at the same time on multiple vCPUs, the warning can happen. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index 50405c561394..d14be8aba2d7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -1560,8 +1560,11 @@ static void svm_set_vintr(struct vcpu_svm *svm) { struct vmcb_control_area *control; - /* The following fields are ignored when AVIC is enabled */ - WARN_ON(kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu)); + /* + * The following fields are ignored when AVIC is enabled + */ + WARN_ON(kvm_apicv_activated(svm->vcpu.kvm)); + svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR); /* -- 2.26.3