Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: Iajfa+PReLhQUtGxST/O/rpPO3Y5RQ7OYyh7fusDAjIJsko2dJjKi/7vV94HirIAt/SDqaKnKP
 o59oXVh7Z26Q==
IronPort-SDR: 5g/zksFLyxZZs31WhAZ9wcBMwnIFj2s9RS5yOHj9RFyya9cECjmoJEwaEBDmw2kUyEVWvC8o6f
 tz/s23u6oyDw==
Date:   Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:15:19 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Amireddy Mallikarjuna reddy 
        <mallikarjunax.reddy@linux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Abanoub Sameh <abanoubsameh8@gmail.com>,
        Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= <marek.behun@nic.cz>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] leds: core: The -ENOTSUPP should never be seen
 by user space
Message-ID: <YNMz59WLCMwr0rVD@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210529111935.3849707-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210529111935.3849707-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 02:19:23PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Luckily there is no user which checks for returned code and actually
> returns it, but since the function is exported any user may try to return
> an error code from it to user space, usually during probe phase,
> 
> Replace -ENOTSUPP by -EOPNOTSUPP when returning from exported function.

There were no issue reported by bots, no comments from people (except one tag),
can we do something about this series or should I amend it?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko