Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1947390AbWKLB3z (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:29:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1947392AbWKLB3z (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:29:55 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:62667 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1947390AbWKLB3y (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: <45567868.8020405@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:27:04 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Brownell CC: Linux Kernel list , Andrew Morton , Andrew Victor , Bill Gatliff , Haavard Skinnemoen , jamey.hicks@hp.com, Kevin Hilman , Nicolas Pitre , Russell King , Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls References: <200611111541.34699.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200611111541.34699.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1451 Lines: 35 David Brownell wrote: > > - Only intended for use with "real" GPIOs that work from IRQ context; > e.g. pins on a SOC that are controlled by chip register access. > > - Doesn't handle I2C or SPI based GPIOs. I think we actually need > a different API for those "message based" GPIOs, where synchronous > get/set requires sleeping (and is thus unusable from IRQ context). > That API could be used for "real" GPIOs; the converse is not true. > > - No IORESOURCE_GPIO resource type (could be added though). > > - Can be trivially implemented today, on many systems (see partial > list above) ... no "provider" or gpiochip API necessary. > > - Provided in the form of a working patch, with sample implementation; > known to be viable on multiple architectures and platforms. > > - Includes Documentation/gpio.txt > > Comments? > If this is done, I think it's essential that a "high-level" API (one that supports message-based GPIO) is provided at the same time. The "high-level" API should be able to address the GPIOs addressed by the low-level API. What we do *not* want is a bunch of stuff using the low-level API when the high-level API would work. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/