Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp189363pxv; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:58:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjGXEr98zFe9kt4d411Q+LVxvTA6VodpWYvM3Yu/W6rGtJvG7hfouVdlmW6e5xEnH4D00+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:279:: with SMTP id x25mr415306jaq.33.1624539504882; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624539504; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FwunVI06BBxWrhIydKqD7auVb5eKlkjvHdUTRJTsMhfll4qqw4waO0F3lc1UcylFrq KYPpJaTnkwCMyaOAi1XbKpbsSHWhL8m7sqn4yOJO5Qr3NlAgmODfHyY6SPCyjM6jWYuT NGEepZznVSu3IpYBDMjPVv1qZcD0hKXXojl8Auor7aEjvUZKhC2BtBL555CACDGY63sW +VJPrXZgToBNnULGqTZPdYqEAch+aZTO/rELztK6dbAILLhZJLKaXPeqrAvJN2TwrfqH Lpojga+0G5xogKfeHWaMWyWKcqMfmk/of5MqRqyAfx1hK9dXfAnE3Es+Dt7Biy3HDxLx HzRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=SKF7YI4rvsnmIV6qV7Dsn5rMGVvCVWye6WW/YGddjJc=; b=n+5hiyB/0WC+X2L62R5jJjRUv7wzL6Wuk3+Su0kxuL2Y7UkkJIcu2+aOOftf0P5ngG FYoW+NWxaB6uDrw8u6gnlHU2lIFXGul7q8PaCJ7qcAbdifNOrc6HfAHx8V//WWuSeOwo Q9UKK9RF7TkC3kR+wBE8XyV5h6rJru6GNwPV/FP0W81PCAuDhovp4+/z1T/3dckhixB/ 4Nx557/MdT6GMRboZ4FW7cD/HQiWIg1Uo68XfrjtkvPiGseVYlAAVSF5mEzKXrD9n4no pDxnw+dAHQiWkOeihy00WmRtraUSgRRnIUBVkpgxBm7Sh6iBoMSwV/gMjRRMU4wsPr1K pOWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=vi+R578D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x5si4063056ilu.1.2021.06.24.05.58.12; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=vi+R578D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231269AbhFXNAE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:00:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44794 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229995AbhFXNAB (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:00:01 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38793613C3; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1624539461; bh=HjaVdHowmGn+bxqs/WsvX1B9BQgWJs+HkHjrRTRg8Og=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vi+R578DRyMLSh7YeVvlf8/MfgXWcvIHagCrJTwLTw/5gn5iRFjvk22tRaan2cfIP NlzEh4YvosgFBuI20+wDNMXzbXVc84sJDt7sY81h7zVoVYa8v1vzXksLF2CCAmP3nt 9bo9T1EsRRY4G0e6YoZSw2Pu2uV0kyRbwWRxYTvg= Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:57:39 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+858dc7a2f7ef07c2c219@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: Fix out-of-bound vmalloc access in imageblit Message-ID: References: <20210617223720.29378-1-igormtorrente@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210617223720.29378-1-igormtorrente@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 07:37:20PM -0300, Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente wrote: > This issue happens when a userspace program does an ioctl > FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO passing the fb_var_screeninfo struct > containing only the fields xres, yres, and bits_per_pixel > with values. > > If this struct is the same as the previous ioctl, the > vc_resize() detects it and doesn't call the resize_screen(), > leaving the fb_var_screeninfo incomplete. And this leads to > the updatescrollmode() calculates a wrong value to > fbcon_display->vrows, which makes the real_y() return a > wrong value of y, and that value, eventually, causes > the imageblit to access an out-of-bound address value. > > To solve this issue I made the resize_screen() be called > even if the screen does not need any resizing, so it will > "fix and fill" the fb_var_screeninfo independently. > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+858dc7a2f7ef07c2c219@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente > --- > v2: It Tries to avoid the problem found by Greg in the previous > patch. > > v3: Add a big comment explaining why this is being done the way > it is. > --- > drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c > index fa1548d4f94b..a0207525a945 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c > @@ -1220,7 +1220,20 @@ static int vc_do_resize(struct tty_struct *tty, struct vc_data *vc, > new_screen_size = new_row_size * new_rows; > > if (new_cols == vc->vc_cols && new_rows == vc->vc_rows) > - return 0; > + /* This function is being called here to cover the case Please do not use networking style comments, use normal ones: /* * This function... > + * where the userspace calls the FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO twice, > + * passing the same fb_var_screeninfo containing only the > + * fields xres, yres, and bits_per_pixel with yeird(but valid) "yeird"? And put a space after that word please. thanks, greg k-h