Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp246110pxv; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwojK0DJaT5OlydqYv5+Aiw/hhrZQpDk+9dx835eX4jqHqsjFSrPov3OR/x0rfXY4TQ099m X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9acd:: with SMTP id x13mr4301071ion.134.1624543611470; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624543611; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aVGIasK2bMrRnQrSVX4s5SidsLczccmM//KJT2FrSKb3KXBO/Ih6q6jGazZrgridCU 3hQcdxziUUE4tnycdCs7OZjAV9NAWXCz8yro6JMOujNpGwyl51oBcIc+IHXcMrwsjiMq 4Ry9cmjrIViSXebViudq0uKraNeIB6hcdjRomumri45wekMMehgBUWShDcXzhohUUzPD W0sk97POd6P9bziWyqnwdgiEKggT15ZP3nfKDqJnc6TNW6EOU0pyrGkNZyJRYiEK2FSP /Y6ot8itfu4pMdW4ogiXgHmieU2G6iIqTbdS6qvo7PbAxeF+mYl29pY9y8soSH3pFjoV RwLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=+xK+g28u7Rmt2pWbsDnAZV/Joevw8IRDkwUers2DAWQ=; b=JSjLnZb01fxBFS5qfQgkWnHdFeiZ/V7XrE5VonPtf14wprQROjqyF0AGvaNhjCHMNS hPHKiEcwd4iG2raKEkBtLyn5CeKkd9iB/FXoGl7olgj3P7cwO84DDOfxKT4CnECpcQH6 sBg+rXV8j6+z5hVeGvyNHGtZi3ulSuH7ktNS8YQQ2no7BsgPKuWy1qjnyt2dQsqHconh K5wDCEAuQZwC+HLvBwTiPOXrCMvbZcswP1cKmmhwMI87XowQVZQziXKHpqnvvnmQUAvy wZzjOOJf8XJquaeN0j0DAKBdiJAVwo64NGLrxrpjsnVsyA0O/UneNwYFhhArxCOJ6dAp i2WA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v9si3702879ilu.78.2021.06.24.07.06.38; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231294AbhFXOIA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:08:00 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:57574 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229878AbhFXOH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:07:59 -0400 Received: from sslproxy05.your-server.de ([78.46.172.2]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1lwPz6-0006Zz-65; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:05:36 +0200 Received: from [85.7.101.30] (helo=linux-3.home) by sslproxy05.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lwPz5-000JT6-UK; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:05:35 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf: more lenient bpf_skb_net_shrink() with BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO To: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=c5=bbenczykowski?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=c5=bbenczykowski?= , Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Linux Network Development Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , BPF Mailing List , "David S . Miller" , Willem de Bruijn References: <20210617000953.2787453-1-zenczykowski@gmail.com> <20210617000953.2787453-4-zenczykowski@gmail.com> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <919e8f26-4b82-9d4c-8973-b2ab2b4bc5bf@iogearbox.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:05:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210617000953.2787453-4-zenczykowski@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.2/26211/Thu Jun 24 13:04:24 2021) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/17/21 2:09 AM, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > From: Maciej Żenczykowski > > This is to more closely match behaviour of bpf_skb_change_proto() > which now does not adjust gso_size, and thus thoretically supports > all gso types, and does not need to set SKB_GSO_DODGY nor reset > gso_segs to zero. > > Something similar should probably be done with bpf_skb_net_grow(), > but that code scares me. Took in all except this one, would be good to have a complete solution for both bpf_skb_net_{shrink,grow}(). If you don't have the cycles, I'll look into it. Thanks, Daniel