Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752593AbWKLSnc (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:43:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752622AbWKLSnc (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:43:32 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:49414 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752593AbWKLSnb (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:43:31 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:43:10 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alasdair G Kergon , Eric Sandeen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Srinivasa DS , Nigel Cunningham , David Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex Message-ID: <20061112184310.GC5081@ucw.cz> References: <20061107183459.GG6993@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <20061109232438.GS30653@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <20061109233258.GH2616@elf.ucw.cz> <200611101303.33685.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200611101303.33685.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 39 Hi! > > Okay, so you claim that sys_sync can stall, waiting for administator? > > > > In such case we can simply do one sys_sync() before we start freezing > > userspace... or just more the only sys_sync() there. That way, admin > > has chance to unlock his system. > > Well, this is a different story. > > My point is that if we call sys_sync() _anyway_ before calling > freeze_filesystems(), then freeze_filesystems() is _safe_ (either the > sys_sync() blocks, or it doesn't in which case freeze_filesystems() won't > block either). > > This means, however, that we can leave the patch as is (well, with the minor > fix I have already posted), for now, because it doesn't make things worse a > bit, but: > (a) it prevents xfs from being corrupted and I'd really prefer it to be fixed by 'freezeable workqueues'. Can you point me into sources -- which xfs workqueues are problematic? (It would be nice to fix that for 2.6.19, and full bdev freezing looks intrusive to me). > (b) it prevents journaling filesystems in general from replaying journals > after a failing resume. I do not see b) as an useful goal. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/