Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753089AbWKLUcr (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:32:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753096AbWKLUcr (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:32:47 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:26593 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753083AbWKLUcq (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:32:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7495] New: Kernel periodically hangs. From: Arjan van de Ven To: Ingo Oeser Cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , David Howells , Neil Brown , "bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex@hausnet.ru, mingo@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200611122019.09851.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> References: <200611111129.kABBTWgp014081@fire-2.osdl.org> <20061112125357.GH25057@stusta.de> <1163337376.3293.120.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200611122019.09851.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:32:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1163363556.15249.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 (2.8.1.1-3.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1344 Lines: 32 On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Ingo Oeser wrote: > Hi there, > > On Sunday, 12. November 2006 14:16, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > If this isn't UP this could be the first real case of "noapic" in your > > entire list...... which isn't too useful. > > Maybe we need to get more/any people who see "need noapic on SMP" to > > file a bug (and provide a reasonable amount of info) > > I need noapic since ever (5 years!) to get my USB controller running. > Without noapic it doesn't get any interrupts for some reason. so it never worked? (that's important to know versus regression) Also does this machine use ACPI for interrupt routing? That's also important, because if you're NOT using ACPI, "noapic" means that you're using the PIRQ for irq routing and not MPS, so you're not "just" changing apic behavior, you're actually using a different BIOS table. (and to be honest, a buggy bios table is more likely the cause ... ;) -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/