Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:22:44 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is
 destroyed
Message-ID: <YNWR+oSGfulOWziI@zn.tnic>
References: <20210616003634.320206-1-kai.huang@intel.com>
 <20210623132844.heleuoxogrpz3cpm@kernel.org>
 <925090f035b8e749ea7aca8c857690c8afba7349.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <925090f035b8e749ea7aca8c857690c8afba7349.camel@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:45:35PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> Should we consider to get this into 5.13, since it is a fix?

We have considered it, have queued it, you're on Cc on the tip-bot
notification:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/162377378414.19906.6678244614782222506.tip-bot2@tip-bot2

In the meantime, that fix landed upstream and will be in 5.13:

4692bc775d21 ("x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed")

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette