Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:47:59 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is
 destroyed
Message-ID: <YNXej3ru9kxQugvR@zn.tnic>
References: <20210616003634.320206-1-kai.huang@intel.com>
 <20210623132844.heleuoxogrpz3cpm@kernel.org>
 <925090f035b8e749ea7aca8c857690c8afba7349.camel@intel.com>
 <YNWR+oSGfulOWziI@zn.tnic>
 <6df0600b755ca067a6c4ff82af47297feafa088a.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6df0600b755ca067a6c4ff82af47297feafa088a.camel@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:04:53AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> Oh sorry I thought the patch would go via x86/sgx branch

We usually send fixes through tip's urgent branches because they go
straight to Linus and not wait for the merge window.

> and I didn't monitor the tip-bot2 mail which was moved to my local x86
> folder.

That's not optimal because those tip-bot notifications are *exactly* for
that - to let the involved parties know that the patch has been queued.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette