Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 26 Jun 2021 00:10:14 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: add and use SUPRESS_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT
Message-ID: <YNZGNvGn/pkMhsx+@localhost.localdomain>
References: <YNYz+hVeqsQmiEqN@localhost.localdomain>
 <CANiq72=qtAcsyReu85AVT-cSf3dcvbnTpQYEF1JhxCRP0WgHUw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=qtAcsyReu85AVT-cSf3dcvbnTpQYEF1JhxCRP0WgHUw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:34:29PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:52 PM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +/*
> > + * "(void)" is enough for clang but not for gcc.
> > + */
> > +#define SUPRESS_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT     (void)!
> 
> While it is related to the attribute, this macro is not an attribute,
> so please add it somewhere else.

This is natural place. If you're supressing WUR, then the WUR macro
itself is defined implying that the header has been included.

> By the way, the name has a typo.

Ha!