Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1565036pxv; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS+UPMIv8EQP5+t4+O0yAuKCeutYN3SNvc4QkeNUIomxfbupkaYTD4csbDSf2WIakSBkVC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:d4b:: with SMTP id d11mr11396020jak.112.1624663997134; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624663997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zUPzLOX6r04+Jygl6qZ8u5M+YbTC+qM4fYYqTRaPPlEcOXvibT+xipoXnpIPj8VxGR AHjXwMlUAj2mjbwEJCU2Ko9ljBKgsoi55KrKdWQDmrUvC5JyCBMyn6mJgWfMLY39XoAB 8R98KD5cLa8xaygiLU5fkYVSPP8/0eotl02ivebePEhkXwS0JHdAQ2kSJCEOWGwuPZFK jzZXy5tldTK2mi0+mdH+xfHofZS0hz0DKNhe63FUm5N9hOk0MMV1Wx8aVRt1qDKbAQLe 2P+mafS5viFSEQPWpNI7YKGtTKaJpqxqyPI7VWr+x50rlJWnoNDRF+yZ+FP7xVhy8rOd /ozg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:date:to:cc:from:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=gx4z69JK8B1m24jj5p5HkcPmeM5Zoi7oy/pqkyg5PL4=; b=0eFPIxv9qRMZUtP5tPnJFwhW4wVrZmmi41yFQxh9MM5jLiAfNQlUmXZdnlSvVRXF5Z +W2m0Dkp4ieqjDjnwZx6XUYrFajxZJI7GTWeWPeVkUQsYamDB2uRxbYWjpg0Ybv9XaXo BjDymm0F9HSx5b2bZlY+j0Kr3Zg0oSejr21UMC9y6zfkr+B1jsEIy5weiznaAIOJ0LRt 6jVxPLtu0TYbVPGTyuz1y8TUFSWbP43AZnCgMBbbMI65RLfnQ9arS9J26kj8OgyXVT9s 9dI83ALUOjGzRUHmaBon4dDvjjUWURrclWs/ZsGJ+wkujyg3qLi+uRRYAL0OTMNDiPTo 6KNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=bW1wwQtt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s17si2954121ilo.141.2021.06.25.16.33.00; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=bW1wwQtt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229915AbhFYXdg (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 19:33:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49868 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229884AbhFYXdg (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 19:33:36 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2D306194F; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 23:31:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624663874; bh=gx4z69JK8B1m24jj5p5HkcPmeM5Zoi7oy/pqkyg5PL4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=bW1wwQttYOmlwa2rjEEnr0Mp8iZGp75nskWzdpChMTN2VWb0sp1T+Ia8aJXaXGhGY un7RUgy+mm97xnWOF65Q4B6RqdFm6a+394mzULPtJhAxxj04zW5roHFwrh7VvXoq3B TTLLCk3WIf0Amk0Tg7MBdWszPXbREWQ06DwAVqGhLysupAg1zAP8Eu42RZ6Vd6VqrV Z1r8ejjjmIdN9PiQZGCBAue/YW41Yu3xVWeTmugS8/IfxgArHlzkWfq1LuoFDGRTZm LYtn3JUrAMp48yw45ZmVwm0B/dlrAw50GtLhXlz9TC776zq7Fl2orM1bjoZXp1tp8K sJ8EuysqygPBg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210617082759.1008-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <20210617082759.1008-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: tegra: tegra124-emc: Fix possible memory leak From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Zhen Lei To: Dmitry Osipenko , Jonathan Hunter , Michael Turquette , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , Thierry Reding , Zhen Lei , linux-clk , linux-kernel , linux-tegra Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:31:13 -0700 Message-ID: <162466387362.3259633.2364843071785127818@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Zhen Lei (2021-06-17 01:27:59) > When krealloc() fails to expand the memory and returns NULL, the original > memory is not released. In this case, the original "timings" scale should > be maintained. >=20 > Fixes: 888ca40e2843 ("clk: tegra: emc: Support multiple RAM codes") > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei > --- Looks correct, but when does krealloc() return NULL? My read of the kerneldoc is that it would return the original memory if the new allocation "failed". Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd