Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1693115pxv; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:55:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwN9QaxyHJSwItWmrUPhv79tVvHjhsa0506VY1i3jdSS9+o7rqEiX6ORkBat8BrLTfoQJfH X-Received: by 2002:a02:ccab:: with SMTP id t11mr12402862jap.1.1624679707090; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:55:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624679707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xRu0GmRZcJeVggdePMHGNaCP4WZeTjN4bpGhWrNswS5keEps2Xz8Mo/CcTykTCCrCS 99nCWZLd0w8GnThCC2TQiiZguo+ZyCy1A6qhvfki23jSLtzWTLKLDxdMrvb8vgqTtYjX UYd2vDZ1rZC9k16zDP9/ZcHv1YkYZgDUgfsqkkSMsMDBMOEvAvrSsVM+Dzvanj+3dIs1 aBWeHUbXe1pYHKukGh6/92VH+kpy78Pw1O6v14Km25Zn7AnBPIVCMh2A0W8zeLW7RNUG xMAf7qjFfWHXhSuDxILYwZ3xA4FweDDQLiBaz4q6nKkKCNAmVDcehVm3aAuqEAAw4ciP 5ZcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=uDu2gOYDDPMcJuXgCwfOhiDafYqz5sGr7Dgoglz9WY0=; b=E0/RI2OqTQhF8TDw7Cpu8/rWL1YWy/yvncwJQ+m91bXeXSo8HXYGT1YSJjiUWUAlQH eOt1EmFORHd9CO3zvfXLGiwDI9GmZmX2OL+33HQDWubgR4kUvTGqxASPbkme/pZnV6MP rnndL556VgQAB1aC1ezvzdoJbmXbHu+sXl0IsK5IUR0W5Lj77ggyciIJKsCCCr4e8gLp mBgHN0x2415i4dGB0WsX26MyWSjCT8CsAGFplwiN+nzqdn8ofTkuJo2kk8IbG1srIx+I tHVvp6cz46DeSKKqYEHCt66Dsc+vj/5FU5X4TXYHzsddqgwv8AD+vz+2tRp30p6ZLbU9 Kgbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5si8152651ilh.139.2021.06.25.20.54.42; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229915AbhFZDzi (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 23:55:38 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:5083 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229873AbhFZDzh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 23:55:37 -0400 Received: from dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GBfwJ1tbMzXlC5; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:48:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.57] (10.174.179.57) by dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:53:14 +0800 To: , , , , , From: Kemeng Shi Subject: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, badrange: replace div_u64_rem with DIV_ROUND_UP Message-ID: <194fed48-eaf3-065f-9571-7813ad35b098@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:53:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.179.57] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggeme755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.101) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org __add_badblock_range use div_u64_rem to round up end_sector and it will introduces unnecessary rem define and costly '%' operation. So clean it with DIV_ROUND_UP. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- V1->V2: -- fix that end_sector is assigned twice, sorry for that. drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c index aaf6e215a8c6..af622ae511aa 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c @@ -187,12 +187,9 @@ static void __add_badblock_range(struct badblocks *bb, u64 ns_offset, u64 len) const unsigned int sector_size = 512; sector_t start_sector, end_sector; u64 num_sectors; - u32 rem; start_sector = div_u64(ns_offset, sector_size); - end_sector = div_u64_rem(ns_offset + len, sector_size, &rem); - if (rem) - end_sector++; + end_sector = DIV_ROUND_UP(ns_offset + len, sector_size); num_sectors = end_sector - start_sector; if (unlikely(num_sectors > (u64)INT_MAX)) { -- 2.23.0 -- Best wishes Kemeng Shi