Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] sh: fixes for various build and kconfig warnings
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
References: <20210627220544.8757-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
 <be15fd85-1d35-0cba-5c27-8273f0647f94@physik.fu-berlin.de>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <0c2c5638-09a7-d69b-7a0d-eb2abbe83738@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:30:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <be15fd85-1d35-0cba-5c27-8273f0647f94@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/27/21 3:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Randy!
> 
> On 6/28/21 12:05 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Fix a few build warnings and one kconfig warning on SUPERH.
>>
>> v2: add a previously-sent Kconfig patch
>>     add a few more Cc's
>>
>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
>> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>
>> [PATCH 1/3 v2] sh: fix kconfig unmet dependency warning for FRAME_POINTER
>> [PATCH 2/3 v2] sh: define __BIG_ENDIAN for math-emu
>> [PATCH 3/3 v2] sh: fix READ/WRITE redefinition warnings
>>
>>  arch/sh/Kconfig.debug             |    1 
>>  arch/sh/include/asm/sfp-machine.h |    8 +++++
>>  arch/sh/math-emu/math.c           |   44 ++++++++++++++--------------
>>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> I'll test these tomorrow on my SH-7785LCR board. Would it be possible to queue
> them up for linux-next after verification?

Thanks.  Hopefully they will be queued and put into linux-next,
but that's up to the arch/sh/ maintainers, and I haven't heard
from them lately.  :(

-- 
~Randy