Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755313AbWKMRRH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:17:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755311AbWKMRRH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:17:07 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]:40569 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755316AbWKMRRE (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:17:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Oird7dXik0GjjtlAt25I8FaQTUebhWv4eWqXDSHOgAzn7mWGHtInaFInaRVlnLcbrIJ8msQvkKFtH0vrWByarExQPFj2jWv61L97rUX4AYLjZhSOOw+RSvp3TbO5q12JUcdM0M4wmnXK4ik6qMzauv//jTcetuBxz8ZYl2ZxHVo= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:17:02 -0800 From: "Zack Weinberg" To: "Arjan van de Ven" Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] permission mapping for sys_syslog operations Cc: "Chris Wright" , "Stephen Smalley" , jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1163411238.15249.114.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061113064043.264211000@panix.com> <20061113064058.779558000@panix.com> <1163409918.15249.111.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1163411238.15249.114.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6d338f0e2667bc1a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 20 On 11/13/06, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 01:29 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > I thought the point of the "unifdef" thing was that it made a version > > of the header with the __KERNEL__ section ripped out, for copying into > > /usr/include, so you didn't have to do that ... > > yes it is, however it's mostly for existing stuff/seamless transition. > It's a hack :) > If you can avoid it lets do so; you already have the nice clean header, > so lets not go backwards... you HAVE the clean separation. ok, but I gotta ask that you tell me what to name the internal header, I can't think of anything that isn't ugly. zw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/