Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp3919281pxv; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:40:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyr6qlizxFb/6+Wmk6S0PrbILTg2WQyjwKRoPiruX9dfY+M5YOpimvsm384V9kXp98+Wkq X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9c43:: with SMTP id 3mr1487943iof.123.1624923603713; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:40:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1624923603; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e7DSFzW0mB1YaoZKM5ZBYn33OEqrPzX5c/QteOP8A9NmZM9kBT7J1VAg2T69sTI7s7 mTKXddUwzQeiXfXrG1UCQ3A+opsKOFYtHQSyGApeVxUsgeiicZSdI2WFShGL5ZxlJlD2 nDGuIx5uxbbOng7qxBeqX/Ueqvh0qST70fBpaEO+NSOO/JnUFjKVd4BSRcxcjY6CQkUc e/HfbCEg1zYSSOHNO1JnjtfiYrNS6CeQdvY5gHJwOtRp/z0UIQoEaCzxQRZAatxwzN9b D7dX/4efA9+cWaYw9Ea/+4BnRIa4WyhW5VKlOvaOhfXWhnLv5PD+6k8OZhdtyvUOpFE5 Xnbg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject:dkim-signature; bh=8ssRK52MSevAKyQoJxF4jNVc366d3EchjdXo13/rUh0=; b=sFGHXYNwFVYaX8cGbA6hWONyq2nvnDKloh4QBU7TR5ZrLw8kmuCgRVS/dQpwtoRP4w Tc7JXXfu5XTu96TVmAeSKRmxM6TsUAdrDzK3ikxc5HFjn6RNF646zZLFENFMucTWq1C9 d5nGPSlTgPVR9P9pkJ5Z9wd79M1NQGsTYecor5C7ct1tqMPjGvS728YMlvhcl6zh9GZh VYNSS7Cv69kFpM3AoNz60w0MHxUeabzM0HuZK7up5Iui8Ujy3hKi0V9dCy2xwt2YO054 SbH7cgYZEd1n3WlYWqFCL21himBXA+G36xV1jXJqnjy2Z4KtpIZ4eogDPinibjmye8Ry GhRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OTreY5lH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k24si21474322jan.49.2021.06.28.16.39.52; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OTreY5lH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233134AbhF1RQ4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:16:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45292 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232084AbhF1RQy (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:16:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EAD6C061574; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id x16so14653819pfa.13; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8ssRK52MSevAKyQoJxF4jNVc366d3EchjdXo13/rUh0=; b=OTreY5lHoXNQ2THoqnz3iL4Rn8/qrdaoVrPCgJ8vwojjNX7ZbIGTNwLMegvtr3NEOx f4x1ieFMEEfPUc+TUB8eorPq6zNdNyAzIl04LigkNLL3eYJ5nryN8cPp+/c0l7T7gh4d dvS7oNd42R5Qco5BpF18DRN/tO3wBHjIcTLCCqfWMep5h3drVoEgJZgzx8BgTvWTjGv6 iWoA3UG/Pe7zVTznLVgkz043hgsRJ5glZMvlCON65HheZ55cf5N6XebXtVxwPWm3mpJV MocqOsJokcMgzOQIIvEyDIafgzBURe9vogeNPnCUUsJDmqPGT9rr8UiKR3HW1MubaqDY cFvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8ssRK52MSevAKyQoJxF4jNVc366d3EchjdXo13/rUh0=; b=Gm/RNHr/4GNgBbwEjUssP4hhjYLHe2xVuQhRsz5TTXM8rJvbACJRD1jrD5YOxCPaph e6zm2wb+GB2XpoFkj7lP3U9ch0ekdEV9yXt1sL03gREuSCllWFij6TN7KKkeTfUe7bkl v1OJtxgUHBYfmxdNHNqTYtHP7UqIkl9DPaGijTd2cTu5JHTEpWgSwQ1bQ9KBYwrXQHMl xS8OU5xZgKaz0q4lPYGb/Fmc3BgVDz0ipqORmD91I12HyIWoTlw8QSkhcVDv5P32SIZm DRn1OFkUjM2K0oC13eSIEulRBBoNc33NppbVYgo/DDxPluh7S1GirHRepRe3KE5BcdU9 SVVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hNQY7ZVFxzMKCYkuAYuoGkVzLNZp+bcoDXrZT+LT6DRHPgryF nXSKNuLKq8ejRtjEbqKWNvE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:f556:: with SMTP id e22mr23969589pgk.189.1624900467165; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.25] (222-152-189-137-fibre.sparkbb.co.nz. [222.152.189.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm3685754pfh.61.2021.06.28.10.14.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Refactoring exit To: Geert Uytterhoeven References: <87a6njf0ia.fsf@disp2133> <87tulpbp19.fsf@disp2133> <87zgvgabw1.fsf@disp2133> <875yy3850g.fsf_-_@disp2133> <6e283d24-7121-ae7c-d5ad-558f85858a09@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , linux-arch , Jens Axboe , Oleg Nesterov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , alpha , linux-m68k , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , Kees Cook From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <7ad6c3a9-b983-46a5-fc95-f961b636d3fe@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 05:14:16 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux ppc; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, Am 28.06.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: >> Haven't found that warning in over 7 years' worth of console logs, and >> I'm a good candidate for running the oldest userland in existence for m68k. >> >> Time to let it go. > > The warning is printed when using filesys-ELF-2.0.x-1400K-2.gz, > which is a very old ramdisk from right after the m68k a.out to ELF > transition: > > warning: process `update' used the obsolete bdflush system call > Fix your initscripts? > > I still boot it, once in a while. OK; you take the cake. That ramdisk came to mind when I thought about where I'd last seen bdflush, but I've not used it in ages (not sure 14 MB are enough for that). The question then is - will bdflush fail gracefully, or spin retrying the syscall? Cheers, Michael > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert >