Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in
 Userspace
To:     Yongji Xie <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, bcrl@kvack.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Mika_Penttil=c3=a4?= <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, joro@8bytes.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
        virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210615141331.407-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
 <CACycT3uzMJS7vw6MVMOgY4rb=SPfT2srV+8DPdwUVeELEiJgbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0aeb7cb7-58e5-1a95-d830-68edd7e8ec2e@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3uuooKLNnpPHewGZ=q46Fap2P4XCFirdxxn=FxK+X1ECg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e4cdee72-b6b4-d055-9aac-3beae0e5e3e1@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3u8=_D3hCtJR+d5BgeUQMce6S7c_6P3CVfvWfYhCQeXFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <d2334f66-907c-2e9c-ea4f-f912008e9be8@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3uCSLUDVpQHdrmuxSuoBDg-4n22t+N-Jm2GoNNp9JYB2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <48cab125-093b-2299-ff9c-3de8c7c5ed3d@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3tS=10kcUCNGYm=dUZsK+vrHzDvB3FSwAzuJCu3t+QuUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <b10b3916-74d4-3171-db92-be0afb479a1c@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3vpMFbc9Fzuo9oksMaA-pVb1dEVTEgjNoft16voryPSWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7e42109-0ba6-3e1a-c42a-898b6f33c089@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3u9-id2DxPpuVLtyg4tzrUF9xCAGr7nBm=21HfUJJasaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <e82766ff-dc6b-2cbb-3504-0ef618d538e2@redhat.com>
 <CACycT3ucVz3D4Tcr1C6uzWyApZy7Xk4o17VH2gvLO3w1Ra+skg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <d30e391f-a900-5182-f732-e7c0089b7cbd@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:03:25 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACycT3ucVz3D4Tcr1C6uzWyApZy7Xk4o17VH2gvLO3w1Ra+skg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


在 2021/6/29 上午11:56, Yongji Xie 写道:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2021/6/29 上午10:26, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:40 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/6/25 下午12:19, Yongji Xie 写道:
>>>>>> 2b) for set_status(): simply relay the message to userspace, reply is no
>>>>>> needed. Userspace will use a command to update the status when the
>>>>>> datapath is stop. The the status could be fetched via get_stats().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2b looks more spec complaint.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good to me. And I think we can use the reply of the message to
>>>>> update the status instead of introducing a new command.
>>>>>
>>>> Just notice this part in virtio_finalize_features():
>>>>
>>>>            virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK);
>>>>            status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
>>>>            if (!(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK)) {
>>>>
>>>> So we no reply doesn't work for FEATURES_OK.
>>>>
>>>> So my understanding is:
>>>>
>>>> 1) We must not use noreply for set_status()
>>>> 2) We can use noreply for get_status(), but it requires a new ioctl to
>>>> update the status.
>>>>
>>>> So it looks to me we need synchronize for both get_status() and
>>>> set_status().
>>>>
>>> We should not send messages to userspace in the FEATURES_OK case. So
>>> the synchronization is not necessary.
>>
>> As discussed previously, there could be a device that mandates some
>> features (VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED). So it can choose to not accept
>> FEATURES_OK is packed virtqueue is not negotiated.
>>
>> In this case we need to relay the message to userspace.
>>
> OK, I see. If so, I prefer to only use noreply for set_status(). We do
> not set the status bit if the message is failed. In this way, we don't
> need to change lots of virtio core codes to handle the failure of
> set_status()/get_status().


It should work.

Thanks


>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>