Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:23:12 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency
 invariance
Message-ID: <20210629085312.j6f4e4b6vuezsqvm@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1624266901.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <f963d09e57115969dae32827ade5558b0467d3a0.1624266901.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <20210624094812.GA6095@arm.com>
 <20210624130418.poiy4ph66mbv3y67@vireshk-i7>
 <20210625085454.GA15540@arm.com>
 <20210625165418.shi3gkebumqllxma@vireshk-i7>
 <20210628104929.GA29595@arm.com>
 <20210629043244.xkjat5dqqjaixkii@vireshk-i7>
 <20210629084737.GB2425@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210629084737.GB2425@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 29-06-21, 09:47, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Okay, makes sense. I have not seen this code actually do anything wrong
> so far, and the issues I see on ThunderX2 point more to misbehaving
> counters for this purpose. This being said, I would have probably
> preferred for this feature to be disabled by default, until we've tested
> more, but that won't give the chance to anyone else to test.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

Thanks for understanding Ionela.

-- 
viresh