Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932488AbWKMVNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932476AbWKMVNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:13:49 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]:33626 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932488AbWKMVNs (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:13:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=bsTNPKG+0OyyccaXGmFYEYp0FiSePMLj2g0vI/RPNzfVWDSYAGWGgR5u1g/eVUkL4ddXE5TA7Bg1ALajVCsHD75klOh29jNL+MtFksaFUK3Qr7eM8qZaxnfnFNWo/ChZkmrLp5Yh3t1JzmRHjVWdSEFnJmpxm2NO8G9IiJl4t9A= Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:13:35 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Zack Weinberg , Chris Wright , Stephen Smalley , jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] permission mapping for sys_syslog operations Message-ID: <20061113211335.GE4971@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> References: <20061113064043.264211000@panix.com> <20061113064058.779558000@panix.com> <1163409918.15249.111.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1163411238.15249.114.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1163438525.15249.181.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1163438525.15249.181.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1260 Lines: 28 On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 06:22:04PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 09:17 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > On 11/13/06, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 01:29 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > > > I thought the point of the "unifdef" thing was that it made a version > > > > of the header with the __KERNEL__ section ripped out, for copying into > > > > /usr/include, so you didn't have to do that ... > > > > > > yes it is, however it's mostly for existing stuff/seamless transition. > > > It's a hack :) > > > If you can avoid it lets do so; you already have the nice clean header, > > > so lets not go backwards... you HAVE the clean separation. > > > > ok, but I gotta ask that you tell me what to name the internal header, > > I can't think of anything that isn't ugly. > > klog.h vs klogd.h ? or klog_api.h for the user one ? > > (and yes I suck at names even more than you do ;) What about security.h, so SELinux folks won't feel lonely there? :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/