Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:12:24 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] objtool: Check for gelf_update_rel[a] failures
Message-ID: <20210629171224.jhlqyyb3lus323o3@treble>
References: <20210509000103.11008-1-mforney@mforney.org>
 <CAGw6cBv2NBCDrZb7ZnmAhZOJ_EwgW6tR-8AfY2v=T9OkD=6O8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <YNmHRi+00RAAUmEt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YNmHRi+00RAAUmEt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:24:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:52:07AM -0700, Michael Forney wrote:
> > On 2021-05-08, Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org> wrote:
> > > Otherwise, if these fail we end up with garbage data in the
> > > .rela.orc_unwind_ip section, leading to errors like
> > >
> > >   ld: fs/squashfs/namei.o: bad reloc symbol index (0x7f16 >= 0x12) for
> > > offset 0x7f16d5c82cc8 in section `.orc_unwind_ip'
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Forney <mforney@mforney.org>
> > 
> > Ping on these patches.
> 
> Josh, I forever forget which libelf versions we're supposed to support,
> 
> But these patches do look reasonable to me, wdyt?

Looks ok to me.  Let me run them through some testing.

-- 
Josh